As so many of us have found GP's and especially receptionists aren't very clued up on Type 2.Just to update on the outcome of this. On the back of my result being a score of 32, ny GP arranged a second HbA1c test and said he would adjust my medication downwards if it came out at a similar level.
When I rang my GP practice for the result, I was told it was 'normal' and I had to ask for the specific score. It was 32 but they advised again that their system said this was normal. When I said that ny GP had already said he would adjust my medication if it was 32, I was asked to ring again when another colleague was in. Again they said it was showing as normal but, when I advised of my previous discussion wiyh my GP and that 32 for someone with diabetes could include variation lower and higher, they arranged for my GP to ring me. After discussing it with him he has adjusted my medication from 2x Alogliptin per day to 1 x Metformin per day, and for me to be retested in December to check the effects.
I'm fine with this outcome, but it does demonstrate how someone could be badly advised if they just accepted that their GP practice said their result was 'normal'.
It's in the normal non-diabetic range.I have type 2 diabetes. As I understand it, although a HbA1c level of 32 would be normal for a person without diabetes, a level of 48 would be more usual for someone with diabetes. On my most recent HbA1c test I have come out with a level of 32. Given this is normal for someone without diabetes, but lower than normal for someone with diabetes, I am unclear whether it should be regarded as on the low side and potentially of concern, or should be regarded as safe and normal. Can anyone please advise?
Whose color coding is this? Seems ridiculous
Sent from my SM-G935F using Diabetes.co.uk Forum mobile app
hope this helps abit xxx
Yes it was a receptionist I originally spoke to, and I don't blame her for simply reading the interpretation that the system gave to the score. What does concern me is, if a score of 32 may or may not be normal for someone with diabetes, why the system flags it purely as 'normal' rather than adding prompts for further enquiry. Someone a bit less assertive would potentially have walked away after the first call without knowing they had a possible issue.Presumably it was a receptionist telling you that 32 is normal. It is normal, so she was correct. The computer would have "normal" written alongside the score. The receptionist would have no idea that it is the medication causing this and that you needed to speak to a doctor. Once you pushed the matter, they arranged for you to speak to your doctor - and hey presto, you got good advice.
But in this case I'm not sure whether a GP had actually reviewed the result before my first call. The advice at the end of my first call was to ring back to speak to the 'results team' but this turned out to someone else from the practice staff rather than a GP, and even they initially referred to the 'normal' statement for the score, so I was left wondering whether it was simply a computerised system giving a standard interpretation to a 32 score.Sometimes you have to go and sit in a room with a GP to get them to engage their brain when looking at test results. Most test results are looked at by whatever GP is checking reuslts on the day, and they have many to look at, so will not look at someone's nodes if the result is "normal". The days of having your own GP that know you are long gone.....
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?