I sort of agree but I don't see it as a competition, just good to share and know people understandThis is a difficult one. I think that sometimes some comments contribute to those feelings of 'anxiety', such as when people get praised profusely for low numbers especially at the Doctors or clinic, you get lots of 'well done', that's fantastic' and so on which makes you feel good when you have worked hard to achieve it and that's great.
On the downside those people who have worked equally hard but not achieved the 'perfect' numbers are left thinking they have done something wrong or have failed miserably. I personally am not the type to become overly anxious if my morning levels are above 6 or give much of a t*ss if a Nurse frowns at me, but I can understand why so many individuals become anxious when they see others lauded for their numbers when they themselves simply cannot compete.
But even if you're aiming for a short life, don't you want to live this short life in a way that you feel well in your body and capable of doing things? If I die tomorrow I'd rather have a good day today where I can do what I want to do without being obstructed by feeling physically/ mentally/ emotionally like ****?There almost isn't a way to discuss this without being told you're being too negative but this is basically my situation too.
They tell you to learn as much as you can, but if you read about diabetes all you find is more and more lists of things that can go wrong with you because of it. From what I have read, it is basically impossible for anyone to have such good management that you can possibly avoid all of the things that can go wrong and the only conclusion I can come to is that it is going to get me one way or the other, it's just a matter of how and when.
Personally I do not want to live for decades of painful disability because of this, I would much rather it killed me quickly. Unfortunately I have found that a lot of people prefer to ignore this reality and instead concentrate on constantly "being positive" which actually makes it worse because not only do you have all the problems to worry about, you also have the fact that everyone seems to hate you for it.
I don't really know that there's a nice way to end this but if it helps, I am right there with you.
Hi Sue, I don't either but I was thinking more about those who are prone to see the numbers of others and then get anxious when theirs don't 'match up'. I almost think that people with such anxiety should be very careful about scouring websites as sometimes they are quite scary.I sort of agree but I don't see it as a competition, just good to share and know people understand
@CartaX2 , I recall shortly after I was dx'd in 1988, I read an article by a 25 yr old (I was 21 at the time) about how she had been told she was going to be blind within a year.
As a newbie, that scared the sh*t out of me, but, in a strange way, it actually motivated me to look after myself. I said to myself that's not going to happen to me. So, I've spent the time since doing my reasonable best to stay in range, but not get too upset if I miss target from time to time, because it happens.
The author finished her article by saying that she tightened up her control and came out unscathed.
I know there are no guarantees with complications, but I don't dwell on them. I have a healthy respect for them, and know that provided I put in some effort to staying in range most of the time, I'm massively improving my chances.
I know statistics are just statistics, but it's sometimes worthwhile looking at some numbers to keep things in perspective.
No idea how Newfoundland/Canada tracks these things, but, just for example, Scotland, where I am, publishes an annual survey, link below.
The most recent is for 2016. There's about 30,000 T1s in Scotland.
Page 84, the number of T1s ever recorded as having a stroke is 651. That's not per year, that's ever recorded. I don't know how long the period of recording is, probably in the report somewhere, the survey has been been running since 2002. Given that there's currently 30,000 of us, along with all the others who will have come and gone since recording started, I reckon 651 is a fairly small number.
Of course, that's not much reassurance for the 651 who had the strokes, and others might say 651 is a high number, but that's up to them. I happen to think it's a small number.
Page 93, a grand total of 17 T1s recorded as being blind. Again, not per year, in total. Out of 30,000.
Figures for other complications are also reassuringly small, we're taking 1% for amputations and 2% for foot complications.
I'm not inclined to trawl through the statistics, but my gut feel is that many of the people who have suffered complications are from the older generation who haven't had the advantages of more modern treatment and screening methods and the people who have, lets be honest here, just not bothered taking care of themselves and think it's ok to run around in their 20s for weeks on end. It doesn't sound to me that you fall into either of those categories.
Like I say, there's no guarantees with this, but the odds seem to be in our favour.
http://www.diabetesinscotland.org.uk/Publications.aspx?catId=3
I don't know what there is in the way of structured education in Canada - hopefully a fair bit, seeing as you guys discovered insulin! - but if there's any equivalent of DAFNE I'd recommend getting signed up on that. It can teach still teach old dogs new tricks.
Pre-bolusing works wonders - don't know if you do it.
Shame the libre didn't work out for you. Some sensors can be sketchy but not all. It's possible to calibrate them with apps like glimp, or the set up I use, a blucon transmitter and xdrip+ which turns it into cgm.
It's worth persevering with - cgm and pre-bolusing are the two things which have made the biggest difference to my control in the last few years. Instead of watching a big spike up to 12 or 13, I now try to pre-bolus, wait for the trace to start inflecting downwards, so sometimes, I'll get a downward spike, or a modest 8 spike. That would be impossible without prebolusing.
Couple of books worth looking at if you-ve not already: Think Like a Pancreas, Gary Scheiner, and Sugar Surfing, Stephen Ponder.
I think there are grounds for optimism - you're complication free after 15 yrs and that stands you in good stead for the future.
The 2.1 you had without noticing it just really means that you're autonomic response system, which usually gets adrenalin and glucagon to tell the liver to release glucose, has become blunted due to past hypos. Many have kick-started it again by deliberately running around 7 or 8 or 9 for a few weeks, not normally adviseable, but the lesser of two evils for the longer term good.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?