This is perfectly normal. All meters are supposed to be accurate to a certain point, but there's an allowable error. From memory it's supposed to read within 20% of the 'true' reading, 95% of the time. So both your readings fall well within that 20% allowable error.Guys I have just done the test 2 hrs after eating. My machine is an acute chek and I got a different reading on the index finger of each hand. One was 7.8 and the other was 7. Both done within 60 secs of each other.
Is this normal or is my machine dodgy?
What was the meal? Being that high two hours after a slice of toast is concerning, but being that high after a big bowl of oats and fruit is probably to be expected even for non-diabetics. You'll learn what different meals do to your glucose and can make adjustments. And yeah, home meters have a lot of variability.Guys I have just done the test 2 hrs after eating. My machine is an acute chek and I got a different reading on the index finger of each hand. One was 7.8 and the other was 7. Both done within 60 secs of each other.
Is this normal or is my machine dodgy?
Hello MattinusaWhat was the meal? Being that high two hours after a slice of toast is concerning, but being that high after a big bowl of oats and fruit is probably to be expected even for non-diabetics. You'll learn what different meals do to your glucose and can make adjustments. And yeah, home meters have a lot of variability.
How is your fasting glucose?
Your fasting is within normal range, which indicates you'd have to spend a lot of time with elevated glucose after meals to achieve that A1C. The post-prandial reading is a little concerning (not super concerning, it could be far worse even taking the high end number), but realize that those glycemic indexes are a generalization and what's low glycemic for one person can be high glycemic for another (and vice versa). I think in your case it's not a bad idea to get a few more post-prandial readings (30 minutes, 1 hour, and 2 hours after) from different meals, along with fasting readings, and redo the A1C in 1-2 months. Perhaps Vegas is really skewing things, or you may have some meals you simply should avoid or minimize.Hello Mattinusa
The meal was salmon, egg noodles stir fry and 2 couple of gherkins. I was at my mums and have read egg noodles are low glyacemix.
I have just done my first fasted reading at 7.15am and it came out at 5.3 which I think is semi okay.
Hi mattinYour fasting is within normal range, which indicates you'd have to spend a lot of time with elevated glucose after meals to achieve that A1C. The post-prandial reading is a little concerning (not super concerning, it could be far worse even taking the high end number), but realize that those glycemic indexes are a generalization and what's low glycemic for one person can be high glycemic for another (and vice versa). I think in your case it's not a bad idea to get a few more post-prandial readings (30 minutes, 1 hour, and 2 hours after) from different meals, along with fasting readings, and redo the A1C in 1-2 months. Perhaps Vegas is really skewing things, or you may have some meals you simply should avoid or minimize.
Those all seem like decent numbers to me. Maybe spot check if you ever go crazy with food a la Vegas to see what kind of numbers you're hitting, but the numbers you've provided are not indicative of the A1C you received (an average of almost 7). I'd try to keep it clean for the next month or two and check A1C again. Was your last A1C in the normal range?Hi mattin
I tested today after all 3 meals
Breakfast bagel, yogurt with berries 2 hrs after was 5.7
Lunch quinoa chicken salad was 6.3
Dinner Salmon potato and salad after 1.5 hrs was 6
I had a A1C test a week ago which was 42 that's what brought me here. Previous to that I had a blood test in Apr 2022. I have no idea the result of that as the receptionist just said all is good.Those all seem like decent numbers to me. Maybe spot check if you ever go crazy with food a la Vegas to see what kind of numbers you're hitting, but the numbers you've provided are not indicative of the A1C you received (an average of almost 7). I'd try to keep it clean for the next month or two and check A1C again. Was your last A1C in the normal range?
It sounds like you may have been nearing pre-diabetes previously? I would just try to keep it pretty clean and retest the A1C in a few months. You may just be someone who can't have a bunch of cheat meals and get away with it. Also keep in mind that the A1C assay can be thrown off by some supplements, such as high dose biotin, so if you're using supplements then give them a 2-3 day break before retesting. It's great you're worrying about this now rather than waiting until you have full-blown diabetes, because it may be a relatively easy fix." hello Mr.....your blood test have shown that your blood sugar has increased very slightly and are now in the pre diabetes range"
MattinIt sounds like you may have been nearing pre-diabetes previously? I would just try to keep it pretty clean and retest the A1C in a few months. You may just be someone who can't have a bunch of cheat meals and get away with it. Also keep in mind that the A1C assay can be thrown off by some supplements, such as high dose biotin, so if you're using supplements then give them a 2-3 day break before retesting. It's great you're worrying about this now rather than waiting until you have full-blown diabetes, because it may be a relatively easy fix.
Oh wow, I'm sorry about your family history. Mine is much the same, so I understand the concern. As far as finger sticks go, I personally put more weight on the after meal tests. In my opinion, someone can have normal fasting numbers long before a diabetes diagnosis, when testing after meals would have revealed trouble handling carbohydrates far sooner. A1C is supposed to capture the entire picture, but it's not a perfect test either since terrible post-meal numbers combined with normal fasting numbers can give an A1C that's normal(ish). All three combined help to understand what's going on, along with some other tests. If I were you I wouldn't dig too much into the details unless you have another abnormal A1C in the next few months.Mattin
I lost my dad last year. He had diabetes at 40. I saw what he went through. He ended up with complications etc and a quadruple bypass. It has scared the living day lights out of me. My whole dad's side is type 2 and i am indian origin. I promised my dad I would look after myself and try and avoid it. So I am trying.
Can i just ask one last question.
What is the most important test when I do my glucose finger pricks at home. Is ir the fasted one in the morning? If that is good am I on the right path?
Thanks guy for the help.In my opinion the best use of testing is just before eating, and 2 hours after the first bite. This will tell you A. How your body handled the carbohydrate content of the meal. 2. If your body is struggling to control your sugar levels.
From what you learn, you can adjust the carb content of the meal until it has no bad affect on your levels, this may meaning ditching that recipe altogether.
Your fasting level, is usually the very last to drop, so it could be very high, but throughout the day your levels could be excellent. so it's a guide to overall, but not an accurate picture.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?