I've been watching some good videos featuring Chris Van Tulleken, who has a lot to say about that official advice - he and others point out that the advice to switch to carbs and ultra processed foods had nothing to do with our health and everything to do with the pockets of the world's most powerful investors. The most astonishing example is that mountains of cotton seed waste product were turned into margarine and touted as super healthy. The byproduct was worthless but the margarine was a gold mine, until the reality of trans fats was no longer deniable. It amazes me that the UK still hasn't banned trans fats outright!My response would be simply that while (as a population) we ate high levels of saturated fat and meat, we had lower levels of heart disease, obesity, and T2 diabetes. When the official advice changed in the the 1980s to recommend high carb rather than a traditional diet of sat fat and meat, we have seen increases in heart disease, obesity and T2 diabetes.
There is usually some sleight of hand going on when dietary fat is mentioned, usually to obscure the difference between dietary fat and body fat. I don't think anyone suggests that body fat, particularly round the organs, is a good thing. However, that body fat is a product of glucose (digested carb) storage, and not storage of dietary fat.
All my research points to carbs and not saturated fats. The disease we have is insulin resistance. What will help is Insulin IQ, the metabolic classroom by Dr Ben Bikman. He covers in over 60 videos everything to do with insulin and metabolic disease on YouTube. It is very easy to understand. Covers fat cell and insulin resistance, how insulin causes weight gain. Everything you ever wanted to know about our disease and the root cause which is elevated insulin levels causing us to be insulin resistant, and how insulin levels are elevated for 15 years before the blood sugars rise. Absolutely amazing series.I know it makes no logical sense and goes against almost everyone's experience here on this forum. But is there anything in his hypothesis. Dr Greger, is a big proponent of the plant-based diet. He's always using research to back up his argument however i've noticed that he is very selective about the research that he chooses to analyse. He only explains and talks on research that supports a plant-based diet.
I'm generally quite clued up, my degree was in experimental psychology but I'm genuinely confused. Is it some mixture , Perhaps saturated fat may contribute to developing diabetes but if you have the condition and it is more sensible to follow a low-carb keto diet. Or is it saturated fat and junk food that is the problem?
This question is of particular interest to me because I suffer from ulcerative colitis and I'm in remission because of eating a mostly plant-based diet. But although I try to be careful even after a small meal, of completely healthy food with the carbs quite diluted, my blood sugar hangs around about 8.0.
Very confused, YouTube is a nightmare for this topic, they seem to be two viewpoints, plant-based and keto diet which seem to be at war with each other, each one totally convinced their right. How is a person supposed to make sense of it all?
It all comes to the type of fat cell and where it is in or on the body. Small fat cells are insulin sensitive and large fat cells are not. The large fat cells are found in the belly where's the small fat cells are the outside of the body.As it is suggested above, I am 100% convinced that Fat people don’t get T2, T2 people are far far more likely to get fat, due to the insulin resistance, try being hungry your entire life due to not being able to utilize your natural energy reserves and not get fat.
The elephant in the room is seed oils like sunflower oil, rapeseed oil and all vegetables oils. Our bodies can process and use saturated fat as fuel. When it comes to seed oils our bodies can't process and burn them as fuel and the high levels of omega 6 causes inflammation in the blood vessels and throughout the body. The seed oils have have 25 times the amount omega 6 than we need as an essential fatty acid. Plenty of research out there. The elephant in the room fructose. Our bodies can't burn fructose and it has to be processed by the liver which breaks it down the same way it breaks down alcohol. It will store the broken down fructose as fat in the liver. The breakdown of fructose leads to NAFLD it raises uric acid levels that causes more damage.You might be interested in what the Journal of American Cardiology is printing in terms of research - here's the highlights:
Highlights
The U.S. Dietary Guidelines recommend the restriction of SFA intake to <10% of calories to reduce CVD.
Different SFAs have different biologic effects, which are further modified by the food matrix and the carbohydrate content of the diet.
Several foods relatively rich in SFAs, such as whole-fat dairy, dark chocolate, and unprocessed meat, are not associated with increased CVD or diabetes risk.
There is no robust evidence that current population-wide arbitrary upper limits on saturated fat consumption in the United States will prevent CVD or reduce mortality.
link to paper here:
Whilst Around 80 - 85% of a type 2 diabetics have insulin resistance, so you are not wrong, however, around 10- 15 % do not have insulin resistance. They are insulin sensitive. The likely cause for these insulin sensitive type 2 diabetics is compromised beta cell insulin secretion.All my research points to carbs and not saturated fats. The disease we have is insulin resistance. What will help is Insulin IQ, the metabolic classroom by Dr Ben Bikman. He covers in over 60 videos everything to do with insulin and metabolic disease on YouTube. It is very easy to understand. Covers fat cell and insulin resistance, how insulin causes weight gain. Everything you ever wanted to know about our disease and the root cause which is elevated insulin levels causing us to be insulin resistant, and how insulin levels are elevated for 15 years before the blood sugars rise. Absolutely amazing series.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?