It is apparently not unusual for cholesterol to rise in the early stages of LCHF. If your body is not switching into keto mode then if the fat input is high, then our bodies will store the excess in cholesterol in the bloodstream, and then as fat in the fat cells. Thus we put on weight !!! When the glucose stores are depleted, and the body starts keto, then we burnoff the cholesterol stores for energy, and this lowers cholesterol a bit. But we also raid the fat cells for stored fat, and this can keep cholesterol raised too, Eventually we stabilise with low fat reserves, low glucose reserves, and then ketosis acts to keep a low weight, ***This in turn lowers the cholesterol back down again, and the trigs in particular should drop right down below 1.0.Hello and good morning,I was diagnosed as T2 in October 2015 and started a lchf diet much to the objections of my doctor/diabetic nurse refused Metformin .HBAC1 was 73 Cholesterol 5.9 January 2016 Hbac1 was 49 Cholesterol had shot up to 7.9 they wanted me to go on stations again I refused the mess, I had also lost about 8kgs April 2016 Hbac1 is now at 36 cholesterol is still 7.9 and I have gained 2 kgs, my question to the forum is how to get the cholesterol down on a lchf diet,I do eat/drink a lot of single/double cream sometimes looks like a small dairy in the fridge!!My carbs are somewhere between 20-50 g per day. Any ideas .Thanks
Holmesi34
I believe we already had this discussion in another threadMind you Ancel Keys may not have been the bogeyman we all think he was.
This is an old blog but none the less worth reading.
https://rawfoodsos.com/2011/12/22/the-truth-about-ancel-keys-weve-all-got-it-wrong/
I quite agree as it says in the blog correlation is not causation.I am entirely convinced that the cholesterol heart hypothesis is total garbage and always has been
Its a good job I can't find that emoji that someone once sent to me, The one thats poking its tongue out LOLHow could I forget maybe not enough cholesterol for proper brain function please do forgive my rudeness.
I found this video where Dr Mercola interviews Dr Stephanie Seneff in 2012
OK. Ive had a quick look, but I am not impressed. Stephanie is a research scientist st MIT Institute of Technology. working on artificial intelligence, NLP, and computing. She was also an undergraduate in biology, but does not appear to have completed her degree.Interesting video and well worth a view, Unfortunately it is the video equivalent of a blogspot, so has no supporting data to back it up. The discussion is well made, and one can see why the Establishment has gone to such lengths to discredit Dr Mercola in the past, I have followed him for at least 10 years now, and he is very much in the Alternative Medicine camp. However, it will be interesting if anyone can dig up the supporting data. I need to see what Stephane has published, Her biology seems to be sound, but I personally would like to get independant collabortion on it. It seems her primary source for data is trawled from comments left on websites like WebMD et al, so again this is low level evidence compared to meta studies or RCT trial reports. It is useful, but I remain sceptic of the claims made here. I am not a supporter of statins, as many here will attest, but if I am to use this as an ongoing reference, I need to make sure it holds water properly. I will research it further.
OK. Ive had a quick look, but I am not impressed. Stephanie is a research scientist st MIT Institute of Technology. working on artificial intelligence, NLP, and computing. She was also an undergraduate in biology, but does not appear to have completed her degree.
I have found several papers written by her in the archives. They are all verbal theory treatises that say if A is true then B follows as a direct result. There is no experimental data referenced, and even the so called trawled database material is not referenced. Just mentioned in passing. The papers are full of what I would class as pseudoscience , overly complicated and meant to confuse the reader. In one paper, the theory is that skin has cholesterol sulphate that is activated by sunlight (as in her interview). Solution proposed to increase protection against cancer is for higher levels of sunlight exposure combined with increased intake of dietary cholesterol. (eh?) In another paper, apparently cholesterol is directly responsible fo releasing insulin in the the beta cells, and so a lack of cholesterol sulphate is responsible for insulin resistance. Cure - more sunlight and dietary cholesterol. Sorry, I don't buy it.
Then there are other papers apparently written by other authors in other institutions, but if you read the abstracts, you soon realise that many of the phrases are familiar. Seems to be incestuous and again no data references, just verbiage.
After a couple of pages of Google search on cholesterol sulphate I struggled to find anyone genuinely researching this important substance. I may be wrong, as it was a very quick looksee. I am surprised that an eminent endocrinologist such as Prof Sikaris did not mention this very important compound either.
She is actually a 'Dr', from a Ph.D degree in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, so I'm not going to give her much credence
The Bachelor of Science in Biophysics fulfills all medical and pharmacy school requirements. Biophysics students interested in research careers can pursue a graduate degree in biophysics, biology, molecular biology or neuroscience, as well as the combined MD/PhD degree in medical physics, health physics or nuclear medicine.
What is Biophysics?
Biophysics is the application of physics to biological problems. Biophysicists use the ideas, instrumentation and computational models of physics to understand living things. From the molecules within cells to the creation of medical technologies, biophysics has an enormous impact on our daily life.
That's up to you of course.
But remember there are many people who are not MD's doesn't mean they don't know what there talking about.
Stephanie Seneff is a Senior Research Scientist at the MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory. She received the B.S. degree in Biophysics in 1968, the M.S. and E.E. degrees in Electrical Engineering in 1980, and the Ph.D degree in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science in 1985, all from MIT. For over three decades, her research interests have always been at the intersection of biology and computation: developing a computational model for the human auditory system, understanding human language so as to develop algorithms and systems for human computer interactions, as well as applying natural language processing (NLP) techniques to gene predictions. She has published over 170 refereed articles on these subjects, and has been invited to give keynote speeches at several international conferences. She has also supervised numerous Master's and PhD theses at MIT. In 2012, Dr. Seneff was elected Fellow of the International Speech and Communication Association (ISCA).
In recent years, Dr. Seneff has focused her research interests back towards biology. She is concentrating mainly on the relationship between nutrition and health. Since 2011, she has published over two dozen papers in various medical and health-related journals on topics such as modern day diseases (e.g., Alzheimer, autism, cardiovascular diseases), analysis and search of databases of drug side effects using NLP techniques, and the impact of nutritional deficiencies and environmental toxins on human health.
Also remember that an MD is a general degree and not particularly highly regarded in the academic world. So having an MD does not automatically make you an authority
So I suppose if you had been around in the nineteenth century and Louis Pasteur had offered to treat you had told you that disease is often caused by microbes or had told you that spontaneous generation was a load of rubbish you would have disbelieved him on the grounds of his lack of mainstream qualification in medicine.
Phlogiston, my dear Sir, Phlogiston is the answer. It cures all bad humours.So I suppose if you had been around in the nineteenth century and Louis Pasteur had offered to treat you had told you that disease is often caused by microbes or had told you that spontaneous generation was a load of rubbish you would have disbelieved him on the grounds of his lack of mainstream qualification in medicine.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?