Littleholls
Member
- Messages
- 20
Hi I'm a new poster and not sure if this is in the right place, I just want a bit of a vent and to hear your opinions.
In September I went to a and e suffering an early miscarriage (8 weeks gestation) and was referred to early pregnancy unit (epu).
Miscarriage was explained way as 'one of those things' etc.
Fast forward to November, all the classic type 1 symptoms began, thirst, urination, fatigue etc. I went to gp and bg was do high their machine couldn't read it and I was immediately sent to hospital for iv meds and insulin. In hospital I mentioned miscarriage and no link was made. All explained as coincidence.
I began the long process of coming to terms with type 1. Was referred to diabetic pre conception clinic and this is where things began to get messy....
Looking at my notes, the consultant mentioned my 'previous gestational diabetes' of which I had never heard.
It turns out my bg reading at the time of the miscarriage was abnormal. Never, during any epu appointment was this mentioned, despite the fact that typically gestational diabetes presents in second or third trimester.
I was left, with known high bg, never having been told, until hospitalisation 2 months later with dangerously high bg (40 mmol).
Why was I never informed of haywire glucose at the time of the miscarriage?
Why was no follow up undertaken following the miscarriage?
Even if hospital perceived this to be gest. isn't it important I'm made aware for subsequent pregnancy?
Sorry, this is an epic post, I know!
I know type 1 can't be avoided or prevented, but I do feel that if my initial high bg had been investigated (or followed up) instead of being put down to gest it wouldn't have got to dangerous levels.
Thank you for reading this essay!!!!
In September I went to a and e suffering an early miscarriage (8 weeks gestation) and was referred to early pregnancy unit (epu).
Miscarriage was explained way as 'one of those things' etc.
Fast forward to November, all the classic type 1 symptoms began, thirst, urination, fatigue etc. I went to gp and bg was do high their machine couldn't read it and I was immediately sent to hospital for iv meds and insulin. In hospital I mentioned miscarriage and no link was made. All explained as coincidence.
I began the long process of coming to terms with type 1. Was referred to diabetic pre conception clinic and this is where things began to get messy....
Looking at my notes, the consultant mentioned my 'previous gestational diabetes' of which I had never heard.
It turns out my bg reading at the time of the miscarriage was abnormal. Never, during any epu appointment was this mentioned, despite the fact that typically gestational diabetes presents in second or third trimester.
I was left, with known high bg, never having been told, until hospitalisation 2 months later with dangerously high bg (40 mmol).
Why was I never informed of haywire glucose at the time of the miscarriage?
Why was no follow up undertaken following the miscarriage?
Even if hospital perceived this to be gest. isn't it important I'm made aware for subsequent pregnancy?
Sorry, this is an epic post, I know!
I know type 1 can't be avoided or prevented, but I do feel that if my initial high bg had been investigated (or followed up) instead of being put down to gest it wouldn't have got to dangerous levels.
Thank you for reading this essay!!!!