I checked on my own monitor 15 mins before my test and got a reading of 3.7 ( lowest I’ve had). Just had results from hospital and they were 5.2.
I discovered in august that I was pre-diabetic (hospital fasting test 6.7). Since then I’ve worked hard to turn this around. I’ve lost 2 and I’m on about 40-50g carbs a day. I bought a monitor and have tested fasting glucose once a week. Results have been between 4.8 and 6.2. Last mon I had a hospital test booked so I checked on my own monitor 15 mins before my test and got a reading of 3.7 ( lowest I’ve had). Just had results from hospital and they were 5.2. It’s such a big difference I don’t know how I can rely on my monitor in the future if I want to check the impact certain foods have on me. Has anyone else had this problem?
I discovered in august that I was pre-diabetic (hospital fasting test 6.7). Since then I’ve worked hard to turn this around. I’ve lost 2 and I’m on about 40-50g carbs a day. I bought a monitor and have tested fasting glucose once a week. Results have been between 4.8 and 6.2. Last mon I had a hospital test booked so I checked on my own monitor 15 mins before my test and got a reading of 3.7 ( lowest I’ve had). Just had results from hospital and they were 5.2. It’s such a big difference I don’t know how I can rely on my monitor in the future if I want to check the impact certain foods have on me. Has anyone else had this problem?
That's probably informative if only I knew what it meant. Do you have some text to go with it?May be EllieM can tell you how you can rely more on your monitor.
HbA1c isn't nessecarily reliable either, in some labs it can be off by 20% (!)
View attachment 52307
In short you can test on 1 hand.. and get a similar difference testing on the other hand right away
Home meters are not lab grade... and have a margin or error
They are if you test more than once a week as the OP @Allell is doing at present.However, meter's are informative to things going awry.. (Or not.)
That's probably informative if only I knew what it meant. Do you have some text to go with it?
Firstly I just wanted to check that the hospital reading was blood sugar, not Hba1c which would be expected to give a different result.
assuming it is I don’t think there is anything to be worried about. All meters operate within a margin of accuracy and therefore the 3.7 could actually have been anywhere up to mid 4. But also what were you doing in those 15 minutes. If you walked anywhere your blood sugar may rise, if your body was nervous about the blood being taken, or getting there on time, or parking the car etc your liver will release sugar into your blood in preparation for a “fight or flight” response. Finally I wear a libre sensor. Sitting here in my chair, fasting (nothing to eat for 14 hours), reading posts, doing nothing, my blood sugar has risen nearly 1 point in the last 15 minutes.
finally congratulations on that 5.2. A normal result which shows the benefit of your hard work. Keep it up, you must be doing the right things!
Could well be stress related.. going to the hospital very likely to have caused a blood glucose release?
Did they just take a finger prick at the hospital or are you talking about another test?
If it was a finger prick why did you have to wait for the result?
Hi there, first off, it's not a big difference, it's a difference of 1.5 which is just about deemed within the margin of accuracy as mentioned. Also, as others have said, that 15 minutes wait can make a very significant difference, I can take mine say at 6, and 15 minutes later it can easily be up at 8 plus or down at 4 plus. Stress, worry, or just running up the stairs can do it, it could be that your body thought its 3.7 was too low or going lower and helpfully gave you a shot of glucose to bring it up to 5 which is a perfectly acceptable reading anyway. I think people can easily make the mistake of thinking that the glucometers are able to give a 100% accuracy reading, but in reality it is nowhere near and it's only giving you the measurement at that precise time. Same with the Libres et al. Try using your meter to take 2 readings from the same finger at the same time and you may well get different readings of around 1 to 1.5 difference. It's not great but it's certainly good enough to be able to use it to see those foods that will raise you, if you eat a food that is too high in carbs for your body to cope with, that '1.5' difference will hardly come into it, you would see it shoot up well beyond your average/normal readings, or hardly at all if your body was coping with the carbs. A Libre or CGM, takes the readings every 15 minutes or continuously and it shows in detail the ups and downs of glucose 24/7, like many other functions of our bodies it does not remain at the same number, it fluctuates. I really don't think it's a problem, it's just that the glucometers have limitations. I (as with any insulin users) have to rely on it for dosage and it's deemed accurate enough for that so you should be fine.
Hi,
The result of "5.2" From the hospital test. Could it have been from blood drawn from the arm & sent to a lab?
It was a test they sent to the lab
Yes it was a lab test.
So it wasn't simply measuring the finger prick test and it might have been an HbA1c which has different units to a finger prick?
Do you have the results with the units that were being measured then we can help uncover the mystery.
A fasting glucose would be a finger prick surely?It was just a fasting glucose test not HBA1C
Maybe we do things differently here in Canada, but every time I go for blood work, the battery of tests includes both fasting BG, as well as a1c. I always wonder why the doctor requests both tests, as the fasting BG can easily be manipulated, such as me giving me a fast working insulin injection an hour before blood is being drawn, thus being a waste of money.A fasting glucose would be a finger prick surely?
I've never had a fasting glucose test sent off to a lab only HbA1c.
Did they draw blood into a vial?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?