Hi AliHey, this is all new to me (not diabetes - have been T1 for 29 years) but I have not heard of being in ketosis - I thought this was a bad thing having ketones in your urine? Are you all speaking about having a low carb diet - mainly fats and protein and is this the ketogenic diet? Is there some risk to this diet, do you consider the nutrients you are consuming and are you getting enough? My hypos vary widely, sometimes I lose motor function, sometimes brain function as in it causes confusion and affects vision and there have been times when I measure my blood and am low with no symptoms - I cannot explain why it varies, I have not seen a pattern. I think when I am extremely busy I am less likely to be aware of what is going on inside and may not recognise symptoms. My insulin needs vary -sometimes it seems for no reason, it is affected by the temperature / weather but I cannot predict when it will change and sometimes it seems to change for no reason. Ali
Most GPs, diabetic specialists even, have never even heard of it, let alone recommend it.Do GP's/medics recommend this state of ketosis? I live in the UK and my nurse has never mentioned it.
Me too, at a very much lesser level. I've actually never had hypo symptoms yet (despite dropping to 3.1 a couple of times after too much insulin/not enough food. I see that as the result of being in ketosis all the time - which I can check on my sweet little Ketonix).I can corroborate that experience. I have seen similar myself, although I haven't been down to quite such low levels.
Antony, You made me laugh out loud (in delight)! You're certainly a person of conviction. Good on you,On the Sunday morning, my girlfriend and I went to the Felsenmeer to climb the rocks (pic below). After a couple of hours climbing up, I measured my blood-sugar at 25mg/dl (1.4mmol/l). Did not have any balance/brain problems with that. We climbed down. During the drive back home around midday (not me driving, by the way), I started to notice a sweatiness and double-vision, my classic Hypo signs. I measured at 30mg/dl (1.7mmol/l).
@LucySW At the point where I collapsed, I suspect my bg levels were sub 1mmol/l. The fact is that I remained conscious, got up eventually and walked away without assistance and was able to consider doing a test to see where my bg was when I was at 1.2 mmol/l. I'd say that it worked pretty well.Me too, at a very much lesser level. I've actually never had hypo symptoms yet (despite dropping to 3.1 a couple of times after too much insulin/not enough food. I see that as the result of being in ketosis all the time - which I can check it on my sweet little Ketonix).
But Tim, what happened then that time with the dramatic Lantus experience? Were you not in ketosis then? That was a trad hypo.
Lucy
Wow! Superstar!@LucySW At the point where I collapsed, I suspect my bg levels were sub 1mmol/l. The fact is that I remained conscious, got up eventually and walked away without assistance and was able to consider doing a test to see where my bg was when I was at 1.2 mmol/l. I'd say that it worked pretty well.
This is why I have very considered opinions relating to Hypos in relation to a low carb diet. I guess it is probably linked to the same reasons that the ketogenic diet works for epilepsy. (My phone wanted to call it a keto genie diet)Wow! Superstar!
(Don't try this at home, kids!) ;-)
My problem with all this is that I can also tell you that I function well at most things when I have very low glucose levels.
I eat 150g of carb a day, if I'm more active it can be more ( the exception is sometimes when walking or running , when I run out of oomph going up hills )
I remember playing a reaction game once to 'prove' it and I used to do mental arithmetic and had no problems (something I read early on to judge if you were hypo). As I've written before I have been riding a bike ,tested and found that I was 'lo' twice in a week. I didn't feel bad and I certainly thought that I was perfectly compos mentis. (just a bit shocked at the result; I retested to make sure)
It's only since I was more careful to keep an eye on things that I get obvious signs at the 3-4mmol/l area. They aren't as obvious as those you read about in books or on websites. If I have a few days with frequent levels below 3.5mmol/l those signs definitely diminish.
In terms of feelings, it feels better to be unaware because there are no slightly unpleasant symptoms; but what is the tipping point for me not on a ketogenic diet or for someone on a ketogenic diet? I don't think that there is any data, just anecdote.
Utimately, I think that it's better to be aware. Collapsing, like Tim above might result in injuries to yourself or someone else.
(I think I've given this link before in a similar discussion. It discusses other fuel though specifically lactate as possibly being protective in recurrent hypoglycaemia but also discusses whether ' recurrent hypoglycemia-induced brain adaptations that enhance lactate uptake and preserve glucose metabolism are ultimately beneficial or maladaptive' http://www.jci.org/articles/view/69796 )
the last link of your 4 had this observation below. Am I reading this right that they took the male subjects down to 0.5 on our glucose meter scale?Hi @phoenix . . .
May I ask, why is it that you have a "problem with all this" ??
Surely your experiences, and the experiences of others on this thread, can easily co-exist ? . . .
Your experiences (and your link) show evolution's solutions to low blood-sugar when the body is not in Ketosis . . . warning signs are given so that raising blood-sugar is encouraged, and if these warning signs go constantly unheeded then further adaptations are pursued so that the brain gets sufficient fuel to function.
My experences (and the links I posted here http://www.diabetes.co.uk/forum/threads/driving-a-wedge.72495/#post-778944) show evolution's solution when the body is in Ketosis . . . brain is fuelled primarily with Ketones so that blood-sugar becomes far less relevant.
We know that brain metabolism is working very differently in and out of Ketosis. I think it's no surprise that evolution should find different solutions to the problems encountered by these two different ways of operating.
Regards
Antony
the last link of your 4 had this observation below. Am I reading this right that they took the male subjects down to 0.5 on our glucose meter scale?
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC332976/
full pdf http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC332976/pdf/jcinvest00637-0253.pdf
" However, no insulin reactions nor significant rises in catecholamine excretion occurred despite equal extent and rate of glucose fall. Glucose concentrations as low as 0.5 mmoles/liter (9 mg/100 ml) failed to precipitate hypoglycemic reactions. "
I hereby volunteer to be a subject in a repeat of these ultra low blood glucose, ketone-infused clamp studies.Yes, that's right . . . it was the 1970s and I suppose the health-and-safety mentality hadn't yet taken over. The few studies on this topic are all decades old and have the perception of being out-of-date . . . and this will always remain the case, because nobody will ever get permission to perform a similar study these days. Shame!
9mg/dl is the lowest I've seen in the few studies available.
I hereby volunteer to be a subject in a repeat of these ultra low blood glucose, ketone-infused clamp studies.
Surely your experiences, and the experiences of others on this thread, can easily co-exist ? . .
One thing we do know is that in the short term, frequent hypoglycemic episodes impair hypo awareness, sometimes permanently. So that is already not a good thing, regardless of whether there may be other as yet undiscovered long term negative effects.Of course they can, but we cross the line when anyone suggests or implies that very low bg levels are not a concern when following a particular diet, low bg levels are dangerous and the long-term effects of frequent and prolonged episodes of hypoglycaemia are still unknown.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?