Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to Thread
Guest, we'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the
Diabetes Forum Survey 2025 »
Home
Forums
Food and Nutrition
Low-carb Diet Forum
How many calories on a low carb diet?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="andrewk" data-source="post: 313851" data-attributes="member: 37453"><p>That is just school-boy maths - and should perhaps be prefaced by "all other things being equal". Can you cite any real published studies that substantiate that human bodies actually behave in such an idealistic fashion? There are references in the Gary Taubes book to several studies that give inconsistent results, such as folk gaining weight when eating less and the converse. Unless you can explain the reason for such inconsistent results then you are simply kite flying.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I don't see that the Second Law of Thermodynamics has any relevance to "system losses", whatever you mean by that. For those who don't know, the Second Law states -<strong> "The entropy of an isolated system not in equilibrium will tend to increase over time, approaching a maximum value at equilibrium"</strong></p><p></p><p>As you correctly say, "obviously you have to account for waste matter". I have yet to see any serious study that has measured changes in metabolic rate and also the energy in urine, faeces, perspiration, breathing and so on whilst trialing changes in diet composition and calory content. Isn't it true that the lack of such solid science is precisely the reason why there is still disagreement about the effectiveness or otherwise of different diets??</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="andrewk, post: 313851, member: 37453"] That is just school-boy maths - and should perhaps be prefaced by "all other things being equal". Can you cite any real published studies that substantiate that human bodies actually behave in such an idealistic fashion? There are references in the Gary Taubes book to several studies that give inconsistent results, such as folk gaining weight when eating less and the converse. Unless you can explain the reason for such inconsistent results then you are simply kite flying. I don't see that the Second Law of Thermodynamics has any relevance to "system losses", whatever you mean by that. For those who don't know, the Second Law states -[b] "The entropy of an isolated system not in equilibrium will tend to increase over time, approaching a maximum value at equilibrium"[/b] As you correctly say, "obviously you have to account for waste matter". I have yet to see any serious study that has measured changes in metabolic rate and also the energy in urine, faeces, perspiration, breathing and so on whilst trialing changes in diet composition and calory content. Isn't it true that the lack of such solid science is precisely the reason why there is still disagreement about the effectiveness or otherwise of different diets?? [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post Reply
Home
Forums
Food and Nutrition
Low-carb Diet Forum
How many calories on a low carb diet?
Top
Bottom
Find support, ask questions and share your experiences. Ad free.
Join the community »
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn More.…