SJC
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 683
- Type of diabetes
- Prediabetes
- Treatment type
- Diet only
- Dislikes
- Diets!
I totted up my 20 day reading averages last night. My average FBG is 4.3 and my average 2hour post meal reading is 5.6.
I also read several articles last night on how sometimes the H1aC test can be wrong. From the shape of blood cells to instrument/human error. This set me thinking since I was diagnosed with prediabetes a few weeks ago.
Can you imagine this scenario? You are told you are prediabetic. You are shocked and then concerned. You go off into the abyss of unknowns because little advice is forthcoming. You research and change diet. You start taking readings but never see a truly bad BG reading ( I have had 1 reading at 7.00 and 5 at 6 point something, the rest all in 5s and 4s).
Now imagine that you have spent all year avoiding so many foods and your yearly follow up test has just been found to be within normal range - not prediabetes. How would you ever know if that first test result was a false positive result? You would have a hard time persuading your GP that it was because it's known as the gold standard test. You might live the rest of your life having to presume you are prediabetic when it was based on an error.
Just a thought.
I realise that the truth is in the BG readings at home. I suppose the only way you would truly know is to eat all the worst nasties and see how your BG reacted.
I also read several articles last night on how sometimes the H1aC test can be wrong. From the shape of blood cells to instrument/human error. This set me thinking since I was diagnosed with prediabetes a few weeks ago.
Can you imagine this scenario? You are told you are prediabetic. You are shocked and then concerned. You go off into the abyss of unknowns because little advice is forthcoming. You research and change diet. You start taking readings but never see a truly bad BG reading ( I have had 1 reading at 7.00 and 5 at 6 point something, the rest all in 5s and 4s).
Now imagine that you have spent all year avoiding so many foods and your yearly follow up test has just been found to be within normal range - not prediabetes. How would you ever know if that first test result was a false positive result? You would have a hard time persuading your GP that it was because it's known as the gold standard test. You might live the rest of your life having to presume you are prediabetic when it was based on an error.
Just a thought.
I realise that the truth is in the BG readings at home. I suppose the only way you would truly know is to eat all the worst nasties and see how your BG reacted.