Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to Thread
Guest, we'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the
Diabetes Forum Survey 2024 »
Home
Forums
Food and Nutrition
Low-carb Diet Forum
Insulin load index / most ketogenic foods
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tim2000s" data-source="post: 851524" data-attributes="member: 30007"><p>[USER=178652]@martykendall[/USER] I've had a chance to review your paper now. I have to agree with [USER=102150]@Spiker[/USER] on the black swans title. With this stuff I don't believe there are such things.</p><p></p><p>In reviewing the correlation data, I'm not clear why you've chosen R^2 in place of r. As someone with a quantitative background, I'd like to understand your reason for that?</p><p></p><p>You have a lot of questions dressed up as statements, such as that about protein. You should probably attempt to provide a number of answers to these or at least discuss the reason for the uncertainty.</p><p></p><p>Reading it, I'm not sure whether you are trying to present conclusions or discuss the data. The conclusions are not clearly spelt out. I think it suggests that it is a scientific paper but doesn't fit the form, ie, an abstract, introduction, data presentation and conclusions, followed by any and all references, which should always be included. Presented in that way, it is will read more like a research paper.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tim2000s, post: 851524, member: 30007"] [USER=178652]@martykendall[/USER] I've had a chance to review your paper now. I have to agree with [USER=102150]@Spiker[/USER] on the black swans title. With this stuff I don't believe there are such things. In reviewing the correlation data, I'm not clear why you've chosen R^2 in place of r. As someone with a quantitative background, I'd like to understand your reason for that? You have a lot of questions dressed up as statements, such as that about protein. You should probably attempt to provide a number of answers to these or at least discuss the reason for the uncertainty. Reading it, I'm not sure whether you are trying to present conclusions or discuss the data. The conclusions are not clearly spelt out. I think it suggests that it is a scientific paper but doesn't fit the form, ie, an abstract, introduction, data presentation and conclusions, followed by any and all references, which should always be included. Presented in that way, it is will read more like a research paper. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post Reply
Home
Forums
Food and Nutrition
Low-carb Diet Forum
Insulin load index / most ketogenic foods
Top
Bottom
Find support, ask questions and share your experiences. Ad free.
Join the community »
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn More.…