Main elements of the definition of disability
The Act defines a disabled person as a person with a:
A1. physical or mental impairment which has a substantial and longterm
adverse effect on his ability to carry out normal day-to-day
activities’ (S1).
A2. This means that, in general:
• the person must have an impairment that is either physical or
mental (see paragraphs A3 to A8 below);
• the impairment must have adverse effects which are
substantial (see Section B);
• the substantial adverse effects must be long-term (see
Section C); and
• the long-term substantial adverse effects must be effects on
normal day-to-day activities (see Section D).
This definition is subject to the provisions in Schedule 1 (Sch1)
and Schedule 2 (Sch2).
7. There is a range of services, concessions, schemes and
financial benefits for which disabled people may qualify. These
include, for example: local authority services for disabled people;
the Blue Badge parking scheme; tax concessions for people who
are blind; and disability-related social security benefits. However,
each of these has its own individual eligibility criteria and
qualification for any one of them does not automatically confer
entitlement to protection under the Act, nor does entitlement to the
protection of the Act confer eligibility for benefits, or concessions.
In practice a Type 1 would almost ceratinly be classed as having a Disability
lovinglife said:I am type2 but think it is right that type1 is classed as a disability - it gives people protection against their employers - or in fact anyone - discriminating against them - eg) time away from their desk/workplace to test or eat or treat a hypo - legally you are not entitled to a break (20 mins) until you have worked 6 hours - if some employers stuck to this like glue I am sure it would be detrimental to even a well controlled T1- that is just one example - there a posts in the employment thread of people being treated badly by employers.
Something being classed as a disability doesn't automatically mean benefits and money and reasons to be treat better than others for no other reason than you can be.- as to the OP question it may be as simple as your son having a small fridge supplied in his room to store his insulin - his lecturers being made aware of his condition and what to do if he has a hypo etc.
Yes there will always be people who abuse the rights they gain but that applies to all disabilities/conditions/diseases - not just diabetes
I do know someone who had extra support through uni as they were dyslexic, so maybe the uni define disabilty slightly differently.
Dippy3103 said:That is what I was kind of getting at. The same condition can be severe enough to be a disability to some people and less so in others.
I'm dyslexic myself.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?