• Guest - w'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the 2025 Survey »

Type 1 Is Lantus Lead To Cancer

Messages
21
Location
Cairo
Type of diabetes
Type 1
Treatment type
Insulin
Hello , I`ve Been Insulatard For 10 Years and Finally Changed To Flat insulin ( Lantus )
After My First Use i Found Articles and Researches About Lantus and Cancer
so I moved To Levemir - I hate this Levemir Pen - its need double dose than lantus to get more Control

So is it True or Myth about lantus ?
Please Answer With Reference Because i Get Confused Last Days

Thanks in Advance

Best Regards .,
 
Wow. I haven't heard this one... Until now..!

I just done some Googling... All I can say is I have been using Lantus for a possible 25 years.
& other than for my diabetes. I have never had any other reason to visit my doctor..

Wickipidia Lantus has an entry which seems to focus on it as a cause for breast cancer, then says...
"Three studies completed in 2012 with large numbers of experimental subjects found no link between use of insulin glargine and cancer"

Confusing.. But then again anyone can put an entry in Wikipidia....
 
I started using Lantus in 2002. It had just become available in the area where I lived. I was one of two people to switch to it, so it was all eyes on us two to see how we coped. I changed to Levemir in 2007 because of the trouble I was having with hypos. If a search is done using the forum using the words glargine cancer risk a list will come up. The jury is still out I think

Sent from the Diabetes Forum App
 
For more detailed information try google scholar, with "glargine cancer risk"..

Even if the bulk of a particular article is quite technical, the conclusions are always written in a fairly easy to understand way. For example, see page 12 & 13 in this study

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00125-009-1418-4#page-1

I think iHs' comment that the jury is still out is probably true, .I took Lantus for 10 years, but have now reverted to Insulatard, for various reasons, and I'm definitely happier on it.
 
I have memories of using Insulaterd back in the late 80's? For a while... Milky stuff in a clear "suspension fluid" that was gently tipped or rolled to mix prior to injecting... Didn't it have a clear glass ball like a spray paint can to agitate the substance, thus aiding the mixture...?

Lol.. Back in those days I always suspected (purely by the nature of Insulatard, nothing grounded) that it had some "side effects" yet to be discovered in the long term....?
 
The US FDA and their UK equivalent currently see no evidence of cancer risk with Lantus (glargine) and have effectively retracted their earlier warning due to deficiencies in the original analysis and failure of any follow up analysis to show a link. But they continue to monitor the situation.

The scare has probably sold several billion dollars worth of Levemir (detemir). :-/
 
I have memories of using Insulatard back in the late 80's? For a while... Milky stuff in a clear "suspension fluid" that was gently tipped or rolled to mix prior to injecting... Didn't it have a clear glass ball like a spray paint can to agitate the substance, thus aiding the mixture...?
Yes same here. Milky suspension and a roller ball. You had to pick it up gingerly so as not to disturb the settled sediment if you wanted to check if it had gone off.

Miraculously sent via Diabetes Forum App. Probably on the 4th or 5th try :-/
 
I have memories of using Insulaterd back in the late 80's? For a while... Milky stuff in a clear "suspension fluid" that was gently tipped or rolled to mix prior to injecting... Didn't it have a clear glass ball like a spray paint can to agitate the substance, thus aiding the mixture...?

Lol.. Back in those days I always suspected (purely by the nature of Insulatard, nothing grounded) that it had some "side effects" yet to be discovered in the long term....?

Hi I was on Insulatard as well ( about 4 years ago)l, but had to change to Levemir after a BIANCA carb counting course at my hospital luckily, never had any problem with either Insulin.
 
iam Good With Insulatard but after fighure out Diabetes solution for Dr.Brenstien
i found this

AVOID INSULINS THAT
CONTAIN PROTAMINE
There are a confusing number of brands and types of insulins being
marketed today—andeven more areon theway. Insulins maybecat
egorized by how long they continue to affect blood sugars after injec
tion. There are most-rapid-acting, rapid-acting, intermediate-acting,
and long-acting insulins. Until recently, the rapid-acting insulins ap
peared clear, like water, and the other insulins appeared cloudy. The
cloudiness is caused by an additive that combines with the insulin to
form particles that slowly dissolve under the skin. The one remaining
intermediate-acting insulin, called NPH, is modified with an animal
protein caUed protamine. Insulins that contain protamine may stimu
late the immune system to make antibodies to insulin. These antibod
ies can temporarily bind to some of the insulin, renderingit inactive.
Then, unpredictably, they can release the insulin at a time when it's
not necessarily needed. This effect, although small,impairs the metic
ulous control of blood sugars that weseek.Protamine can present an
other, more serious problem ifyou ever require coronary angiography
for the study of arteries that feed your heart (acommon procedure
nowadays). Just before such a study, you would be given aninjection
of the anticoagulant heparin to prevent the formation of bloodclots.
When the procedure is over, protamine is injected into a blood vessel
to"turn off" the heparin. This can cause severe aUergic reactions, even
death, in a smaU percentage of people who have previously been
treated withinsulin containing protamine. Thus, even if an insulin is
marketed as a "human" insulin, its effects upon antibody production
may besignificant if it contains the animal protein protamine.
As you may guess, I strongly oppose the use ofinsulins containing
protamine. In theUnited States, theonly oneiscaUed NPH(elsewhere
it may be caUed isophane insulin). NPH or mixtures of NPH and
other insulins are widely avaUable and should beavoided. People who
require very smaU doses of insuUn, such as chUdren, may be best
treated with dUuted insulin (page 272) for accurate dose measure
ment. Unfortunately, there isnodUuting fluid made for glargine, one
of ourtwo remaining long-acting insulins.* I therefore amnowreluc
tantly obUged to prescribe three daUy doses of dUuted NPH on rare
occasions. More commonly, however, I'U dUute thelong-acting insulin
detemir with saline, as described onpage 272.
AUst of the insuUns that I consider possibly suitable appears on
page 269.
 
Back
Top