Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to Thread
Guest, we'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the
Diabetes Forum Survey 2025 »
Home
Forums
Diabetes Discussion
Diabetes Discussions
Joseph Kraft and hidden diabetes
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RuthW" data-source="post: 944422" data-attributes="member: 148713"><p>It needs repeating that fat does not 'fix' diabetes. And exercise DOES 'fix' part of diabetes - the insulin resistance. And without insulin resistance, the body (of a Type 2, we're now leaving aside Type 1s at Lucy's request) does not go into hyperinsulemia. So, it excels LCHF as a means of treatment.</p><p></p><p>So the fat eating 'fix' becomes superfluous or optional - but none of these people whose work you advocate so vigorously deals with that part of the data. It's called "selective observation" or "confirmatory bias."</p><p></p><p>The argument that "exercise is not a factor because it's good for everyone" is rather weak, to put it mildly. As is, "well, people won't do it, they'd rather just eat fat and avoid carbs." In the first case, exercise is especially important for those with a tendency (whether inherited or environmental) to insulin resistance. In the second, that's exactly the reason doctors push meds onto Type 2s without insisting on life-style changes. And I've lost count of the number of times I've heard LCHFers on here pouring contempt on doctors and nurses for doing that.</p><p></p><p>Oh, and the 'source' of the problem is not carbs. It's insulin resistance. And gluconeogenesis from protein also requires insulin, so not eating carbs is not a "cure"</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RuthW, post: 944422, member: 148713"] It needs repeating that fat does not 'fix' diabetes. And exercise DOES 'fix' part of diabetes - the insulin resistance. And without insulin resistance, the body (of a Type 2, we're now leaving aside Type 1s at Lucy's request) does not go into hyperinsulemia. So, it excels LCHF as a means of treatment. So the fat eating 'fix' becomes superfluous or optional - but none of these people whose work you advocate so vigorously deals with that part of the data. It's called "selective observation" or "confirmatory bias." The argument that "exercise is not a factor because it's good for everyone" is rather weak, to put it mildly. As is, "well, people won't do it, they'd rather just eat fat and avoid carbs." In the first case, exercise is especially important for those with a tendency (whether inherited or environmental) to insulin resistance. In the second, that's exactly the reason doctors push meds onto Type 2s without insisting on life-style changes. And I've lost count of the number of times I've heard LCHFers on here pouring contempt on doctors and nurses for doing that. Oh, and the 'source' of the problem is not carbs. It's insulin resistance. And gluconeogenesis from protein also requires insulin, so not eating carbs is not a "cure" [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post Reply
Home
Forums
Diabetes Discussion
Diabetes Discussions
Joseph Kraft and hidden diabetes
Top
Bottom
Find support, ask questions and share your experiences. Ad free.
Join the community »
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn More.…