Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to Thread
Guest, we'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the
Diabetes Forum Survey 2024 »
Home
Forums
Food and Nutrition
Food, Nutrition and Recipes
Just hold on there, fat is now bad again....
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Oldvatr" data-source="post: 1201078" data-attributes="member: 196898"><p>I have read the JAMA artucle, and it does indeed put forward massive risk of death (45%) for saturated fat against unsaturated fats.</p><p>One interesting thing I saw was that the data used was actually the Nurses Health Study which has itself reported recently. The reports I have seen so far have many and various conclusions, but somehow all seem to be unconneted with fat intake. For example, from a Harvard Gazette article</p><p><a href="http://news.harvard.edu/gazette/tag/nurses%E2%80%99-health-study/" target="_blank">http://news.harvard.edu/gazette/tag/nurses’-health-study/</a></p><p>It was publiahed recently and has nothing to say about this earth shattering discovery about fats. I enclose a link to the official report, and you will see that the same data yields very different results to JAMA</p><p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3105270/" target="_blank">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3105270/</a></p><p>I do not trust the JAMA article since looking at the sort of data collected in the Nurses Health Study would not appear to support the conclusions on fat intake to the depth reported in JAMA</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Oldvatr, post: 1201078, member: 196898"] I have read the JAMA artucle, and it does indeed put forward massive risk of death (45%) for saturated fat against unsaturated fats. One interesting thing I saw was that the data used was actually the Nurses Health Study which has itself reported recently. The reports I have seen so far have many and various conclusions, but somehow all seem to be unconneted with fat intake. For example, from a Harvard Gazette article [URL='http://news.harvard.edu/gazette/tag/nurses%E2%80%99-health-study/']http://news.harvard.edu/gazette/tag/nurses’-health-study/[/URL] It was publiahed recently and has nothing to say about this earth shattering discovery about fats. I enclose a link to the official report, and you will see that the same data yields very different results to JAMA [URL]http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3105270/[/URL] I do not trust the JAMA article since looking at the sort of data collected in the Nurses Health Study would not appear to support the conclusions on fat intake to the depth reported in JAMA [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post Reply
Home
Forums
Food and Nutrition
Food, Nutrition and Recipes
Just hold on there, fat is now bad again....
Top
Bottom
Find support, ask questions and share your experiences. Ad free.
Join the community »
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn More.…