Element137
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 128
- Type of diabetes
- Type 2
My GFR in Aug 16 ( when I was first diagnosed T2 ) = 90, this round of Tests ( Sep 17) now at = 86 - I don't understand the significance of it - if any ? or the level of test to test variance - will discuss with GP next week - thanks for the info.lol @Element137 Not sure about "expert" status, but I've definitely had a baptism of fire on CKD, transplants and dialysis over the last couple of years, so have done plenty of research as a result. When looking at Kidney function, I believe the eGFR is the result you should be more interested in, as this shows your estimated kidney function, and takes creatinine into account. Don't be disappointed if you don't get "100" on you eGFR, as a) it is an estimate (and just like investments, your eGFR "may go down, as well as up" from test to test) and b) your kidneys start to degrade form the day you are born. The trick is to simply prolong them, and in case you are interested, the simplest ways to do this is maintaining low/steady BGs and low BP.
Yes fasted test - it was done as part of recent bank of tests -Hba1c/Lipids etc - so fasted for 12 hours - so probably was dehydrated to a some degree.Did you fast for this test? I only ask because if you fasted overnight and then didn't drink plenty of water in the morning you possibly were dehydrated without realising.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?