Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to Thread
Guest, we'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the
Diabetes Forum Survey 2025 »
Home
Forums
Diabetes Discussion
Diabetes Soapbox - Have Your Say
Know your rights!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Buachaille" data-source="post: 19381" data-attributes="member: 1096"><p>"discretion or leeway in its interpretation, implementation, or use"</p><p></p><p>The health professional has, therefore, choices and may or may not wish in light of particular circumstances, evidence/facts available to him/her decide to follow any particular 'guideline'. In doing so I would assume that they would be able, if challenged, to to robustly defend any particular course of action determined by them. (For example, having considered case x within the context of the guidelines on the basis of (whatever) I conclude that a more appropriate course of action would be..... ) On the other hand, a patient might assume, and I think many do, that guidelines are some form of mandatory direction/regulation to take a particular course of action - which they are clearly not. </p><p></p><p>Would be simple if the policy was set out in terms of 'in the case of x the following course of action should/must be taken. But then, if rigid rules applied would we need health professionals to make the decisions. I doubt it. Another task for delegation to the seemingly growing band of Stalinist practice receptionists perhaps.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Buachaille, post: 19381, member: 1096"] "discretion or leeway in its interpretation, implementation, or use" The health professional has, therefore, choices and may or may not wish in light of particular circumstances, evidence/facts available to him/her decide to follow any particular 'guideline'. In doing so I would assume that they would be able, if challenged, to to robustly defend any particular course of action determined by them. (For example, having considered case x within the context of the guidelines on the basis of (whatever) I conclude that a more appropriate course of action would be..... ) On the other hand, a patient might assume, and I think many do, that guidelines are some form of mandatory direction/regulation to take a particular course of action - which they are clearly not. Would be simple if the policy was set out in terms of 'in the case of x the following course of action should/must be taken. But then, if rigid rules applied would we need health professionals to make the decisions. I doubt it. Another task for delegation to the seemingly growing band of Stalinist practice receptionists perhaps. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post Reply
Home
Forums
Diabetes Discussion
Diabetes Soapbox - Have Your Say
Know your rights!
Top
Bottom
Find support, ask questions and share your experiences. Ad free.
Join the community »
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn More.…