I thought fast loss stones was often because it was low fat being used! Or if it’s high fat it’s because you are finally stirring up pre existing stones when the lazy gallbladder is made to squeeze.
I only had mine removed last September despite asking to try disolving them and changing eating habits. Was categorically told it wouldn’t work and scared into it with talk of pancreatitis and disease spreading to nearby organs. Can’t believe waiting less than a year could have given more confidence to wait and try it. Shocking how even in the non profit nhs cut it out, regardless of motivation on the patients part, is the goto option.
I’ve definitely heard that too. No way of knowing if I’ve done or am doing that though.
That said I’m pain free and am managing as much fat as I want on lchf. (Having built it gradually). A few issue for the first 6 months have thankfully resolved. Only downside is ldl and trigs both shot up after the op. Hoping this woe will sort that. (Uncertain if it’s even a real concern).
Having the procedure done will have skewed your lipid levels and if you are losing weight (whether it is planned/needed or not) will also temporarily mess with your numbers.
Stones are made due to congealed enzymes which flow throw the ducts, back and forth. I guess lazy enzymes or too much. The process gets burdened on when a fast change of diet and balances. Fat doesn't really come into it but old papers tried to afix fat as the problem.I thought fast loss stones was often because it was low fat being used! Or if it’s high fat it’s because you are finally stirring up pre existing stones when the lazy gallbladder is made to squeeze.
I only had mine removed last September despite asking to try disolving them and changing eating habits. Was categorically told it wouldn’t work and scared into it with talk of pancreatitis and disease spreading to nearby organs. Can’t believe waiting less than a year could have given more confidence to wait and try it. Shocking how even in the non profit nhs cut it out, regardless of motivation on the patients part, is the goto option.
Can you direct me to any literature/discussion on the procedure itself affecting figures? I can find nothing and my gp claimed never to have heard of numbers changing post op! I’m hoping losing weight ultimately drops the numbers again. They weren’t great before op.
Stones are made due to congealed enzymes which flow throw the ducts, back and forth. I guess lazy enzymes or too much. The process gets burdened on when a fast change of diet and balances. Fat doesn't really come into it but old papers tried to afix fat as the problem.
It does indeed make sense. And between the pre op values and post op there was in fact 5 surgeries in 18 months all separate issues so a lot of healing to be done.Sorry no, I can't. As cholesterol is involved in the building, repair and maintenance of cells and also with the immunological responses that the body initiates after damage or infection then it seems logical that this is one response that the body would have but where I learned this I couldn't say.
Losing excess weight definitely can improve lipid values (depending on how far you go to adjust your diet and what ways you employ to lose the weight) but as I said earlier some people's values can be skewed temporarily because even adipose tissue has a tiny reservoir of cholesterol which can be 'lost' as the fat cells shrink. My total cholesterol rocketed when I was actively losing weight and I got the obligatory statin lecture but it didn't take long for the values to settle afterwards. Some people see very little change in lipid panel results when losing weight so it may not happen to you but it is worth knowing if you wish to avoid taking a statin (for whatever reason).
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?