sheebee
Active Member
Thanks for this oldgreymare
Total cholesterol level doesn't really give much guidance - other than this should be below 4.0 for high cardiac risk patients(ie. diabetics). You should check if your doctor has your breakdown to HDL-C, LDL-C and triglycerides. HDL-C is the good cholesterol and typically you want levels as high as possible. LDL-C and triglycerides ideally as low as possible.
Unfortunately it is still a common myth that dietary cholesterol is the major cause of high blood lipids. In fact carbohydrates are a bigger factor especially for raised triglycerides and implicated in low HDL-C levels. But some find that LDL-C can stay high or rises slightly on LCHF.
At diagnosis as Type 1 my total Cholesterol was 7.74, HDL-C 1.58 (should be > 1.00), LDL-C 5.44 (should be < 2.60) and Triglycerides 1.53 (should be < 2.30).
After a few years mostly low carbing my LDL-C is often still over optimum level, say 3.0, while HDL-C is always above 2.50 and triglycerides under 0.70. Key ratio of Total C /HDL-C under 2.25 (should be < 4.50). Unfortunately not total consensus among doctors which numbers matter most - some still monitor LDL-C as most important (hence those statins prescriptions...), other prefer to track Total cholesterol to HDL-C ratio.
My cholesterol sky rocketed after I started low carbing, total went up to 7. Lots of people on here argue about whether high cholesterol causes heart disease or not. I try to err on the side of caution as I think there's conflicting evidence. What happened to me was that my gall bladder became blocked by gall stones, caused by excessive fat consumption.
It's because I took the mickey with fats; over eating butter, cheese etc. The lack of decent dietary advice from the NHS was the cause of this. You'd think that dieticians would be able to advise more than one type of diet, but hey ho.
It's actually easy to keep your lipid levels under control and low carb. I replaced carbs with veg, seeds and nuts. Only eat so-called good fats. My total cholesterol is now back to normal and my HDL is a lot higher.
The bottom line is that a high HbA1c is hugely excessive risk indicator of heart disease, than high cholesterol levels. So if low carbing gives you a good HbA1c, but a higher cholesterol level, then you've done well.
Spiker nhs say eat low fat you know how anal they are...EISH
Anyhow will take upto 6 months for your choleatrol to turn round on lchf. On high carb your ldl is small tight sticky bad news
On lchf your ldl is big and fluffy and cleans the arteries.
Not read the link just woke up brain not fully connecting but lot of info out there though
l refused statins my numbers for each going the way of the forecast.
look up scientific papers and cholestrol low carb high fat
A you need cholestrol to digest fat
B They do not measure cholestrol (except l understand in huge scientific expensive tests) they measure the carrier and extrapolate in nirmal cholestrol tests.
Just read an interesting blogpost about this today:
http://authoritynutrition.com/low-carb-diets-and-cholesterol/
Glad to be of help.Thanks for this oldgreymareI've got my breakdown now and put it below. My triglyceride and LDL levels are too high from that and HDL too low. Im going to add some Omega 3 to my diet to help the triglyceride level for a start and see if the increased fibre from all the veg also helps. i didnt think i ate very high saturated fats as i am vegetarian, but i have gone a bit mad on the greek yogurt and cheese since i started the diet i suppose. I might moderate it a bit... but then again i have to eat something
Disappointed but not surprised that the BHF booklet makes no mention of the effect of CARBOHYDRATES on cholesterol levels.The initial booklet the gp gives out offers only general quidelines eg the Eatwell Plate. Also a negative comment from the nurse regarding cream cheese! got me questioning the LCHF diet. Since then i was given a booklet by British Heart Foundation which although small, i found very helpful. It breaks down the different types of lipids and what increases and decreases what: http://tinyurl.com/o4v9jcf . So as you say, its not the total cholesterol its a lot more complicated, but i feel im a bit more educated on it now and have a few plans to work on getting the triglyceride and LDL level down.
My mother had type 2 diabetes and suffered from strokes from the age of 64 so that is why i am making sure i am doing this right.
Thanks for the link indy, very informative. xxJust read an interesting blogpost about this today:
http://authoritynutrition.com/low-carb-diets-and-cholesterol/
Glad to be of help.
May I suggest don't worry about LDL too much if still early into LCHF and especially if your weight is dropping - LDL can rise. Aim to improve trigs and HDL - the more you can reduce carb intake the easier this will be. Also you're 100% right you need to eat - LCHF is not about starvation rations! Many LCHF protocols aim to have 2/3rds or more of calories from fat. Saturated fat iin moderation s not necessarily bad - recent review of old studies have shown it is NOT a major contributor to heart disease (though note you mention you've had some gallbladder issues? if yes, then need to monitor fat effect). Transfat is absolute no-no and is in almost all processed food... If you can't take fishoil omega 3 supplements, then flaxseed (linseed) is by far the best vegetable source - walnuts the best nut source. Unfortunately with omega 3 its not just levels in isolation - omega 6 : omega 3 ratio matters and many plant sources overload omega 6. For cooking - olive, safflower and rapeseed (canola) oils are considered good - but cornoil, sunflower and soya oils are too high in omega 6.
Also consider if you could be Vitamin D deficient - quite common in diabetics. D3 supplements are helpful (don't bother with D2). But best is 30 min daily exposure to bright daylight or sunshine with no sunblock!
Good LCHF resource is this Swedish doctor's site : http://www.dietdoctor.com/
Your personal opinion is your personal opinion. But the Vitamin D Council don't happen to agree with you. Here is their article on Vitamin D deficiency and who is likely to have it:l put up info in a seperate thread but will repeat here. lt is dangerous to get suppliments and take them you need to have a blood test which will give Vit D levels. lt is linked to calcium balance as well and immune system.
Diabetes is linked to immune systems. lf you are low as many are you will be put on very high inital doses then lower doses. At +/- 1month another blood test should be done to say what your levels are.
l am on a hold with another test soon to see if l am maintaining or loosing my Vit D
Vit in general should only be taken as food fish meat eggs veg etc unless medical evidence states otherwise as often they interact and esp. in those whose bodies like ours have a problem it can cause imbalances.
Your personal opinion is your personal opinion. But the Vitamin D Council don't happen to agree with you. Here is their article on Vitamin D deficiency and who is likely to have it:
http://www.vitamindcouncil.org/about-vitamin-d/am-i-deficient-in-vitamin-d/
Anyone living at latitudes like the UK is unlikely to ever be able to get enough Vitamin D just by diet and sun exposure.
I do however agree that people should be tested first. However, just recently someone on this board reported asking their GP for testing and was refused. What are they supposed to do then?
I don't think anyone who hasn't been tested should be taking massive doses, but I see nothing wrong with 1,000-2,000 iu per day or every other day.
However, I'd suggest people take a combination of Vitamin D3/Vitamin K2 to avoid problems with calcium. There is a book called "The Calcium Paradox" if people want to learn more.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?