does it keep u stable for the 24 hrs if the dose is split?
Hi Tim2000s@Lynz84 This was a topic I put together when I moved from Lantus to Levemir. You may find it helpful.
http://www.diabetes.co.uk/forum/thr...pefully-providing-some-lessons-learned.70039/
Hi Simon.Split dose levemir is a useful option. One thing to be aware of is that it is probably not quite as strong as lantus. A paper by Julio Rosenstock and Melanie Davis showed folk often needed 50% more levemir than lantus; so be prepared to escalate dose. Levemir might be marginally more consistent than lantus - a useful factor.
Hi Simon.
Thanks so much for this! Its all so much information sometimes!
I too have bigger doses of levemir than lantus but it works for me too.I moved from Lantus to Levemir & for me it was a big, big improvement. I never saw the near horizontal lines I get now when I was using Lantus, especially overnight.
I did find though that I had to use much higher dosages which initially concerned me. However I've come to the conclusion that if it works, then it's fine.
Simon, in terms of "consistency" I'd use the absorption data that was collected back in around 2004. Lantus and NPH are very similar in terms of variability of absorption, in that they are both really quite variable, whereas Levemir was shown to be a lot less variable and much more consistent in how it is absorbed (research paper here and the 2004 ADA article). Tresiba also benefits from this.Split dose levemir is a useful option. One thing to be aware of is that it is probably not quite as strong as lantus. A paper by Julio Rosenstock and Melanie Davis showed folk often needed 50% more levemir than lantus; so be prepared to escalate dose. Levemir might be marginally more consistent than lantus - a useful factor.
Simon, in terms of "consistency" I'd use the absorption data that was collected back in around 2004. Lantus and NPH are very similar in terms of variability of absorption, in that they are both really quite variable, whereas Levemir was shown to be a lot less variable and much more consistent in how it is absorbed (research paper here and the 2004 ADA article). Tresiba also benefits from this.
There's certainly a lot of evidence that people often need more (although I didn't find this to be the case).
The 2004 ADA article was the publishing of the paper. You should find the references within that.You don't have the refernce for the 2004 data? I totally agree that levemir is a bit less variable than lantus.
Thanks for this - most helpful - Best wishesThe 2004 ADA article was the publishing of the paper. You should find the references within that.
Hi Tim2000@Lynz84 for what it's worth, this is the difference between the two for me. The last month of Lantus:
The first month of Levemir:
The key thing was that my broader range of values tracked the median with Levemir, whereas with Lantus, it was much less correlated.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?