• Guest - w'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the 2025 Survey »

Levemir

Lynz84

Lynz84

Well-Known Member
Messages
344
Type of diabetes
Type 1
Hi All

I am on toujeo which is good but because its 30+ hrs, when I need to make an adjustment it takes days for the adjustment to take effect.

My consultant has suggested split dose levemir with injections in the evening and morning. For any of you who are doing this, is levemir a good choice and does it keep u stable for the 24 hrs if the dose is split?
 
Before pumping I was on levemir and it did a good job for me.

I'm not really sure I follow your question
Lynz84 said:
does it keep u stable for the 24 hrs if the dose is split?
Click to expand...

Levemir lasts around 12 hours, so you take it twice a day, 12 hours apart ideally.

You aren't splitting a 24 hour dose, you are taking what you need to keep you stable for the next 12 hours. So I would take a higher dose in the morning and a lower dose to go to bed because I have a history of nocturnal hypos.

Levemir is nice and flexible so if you know you are going on a long hike or some other activity you can take less that morning and there will be less in you - so changes in the dose take effect immediately.
 
I moved from Lantus to Levemir & for me it was a big, big improvement. I never saw the near horizontal lines I get now when I was using Lantus, especially overnight.
I did find though that I had to use much higher dosages which initially concerned me. However I've come to the conclusion that if it works, then it's fine.
 
Split dose levemir is a useful option. One thing to be aware of is that it is probably not quite as strong as lantus. A paper by Julio Rosenstock and Melanie Davis showed folk often needed 50% more levemir than lantus; so be prepared to escalate dose. Levemir might be marginally more consistent than lantus - a useful factor.
 
SimonCrox said:
Split dose levemir is a useful option. One thing to be aware of is that it is probably not quite as strong as lantus. A paper by Julio Rosenstock and Melanie Davis showed folk often needed 50% more levemir than lantus; so be prepared to escalate dose. Levemir might be marginally more consistent than lantus - a useful factor.
Click to expand...
Hi Simon.
Thanks so much for this! Its all so much information sometimes!
 
Lynz84 said:
Hi Simon.
Thanks so much for this! Its all so much information sometimes!
Click to expand...

Yes, that is the catch for patients and healthcare professionals. Things are often shades of grey not black and white. And new things are being found all the time
 
DunePlodder said:
I moved from Lantus to Levemir & for me it was a big, big improvement. I never saw the near horizontal lines I get now when I was using Lantus, especially overnight.
I did find though that I had to use much higher dosages which initially concerned me. However I've come to the conclusion that if it works, then it's fine.
Click to expand...
I too have bigger doses of levemir than lantus but it works for me too.
 
Levemir would do the opposite. Decrease it I think the sugar is high increase it it goes quite low vice versa. I do not recommend Levemir. I am now on Tresiba.
 
SimonCrox said:
Split dose levemir is a useful option. One thing to be aware of is that it is probably not quite as strong as lantus. A paper by Julio Rosenstock and Melanie Davis showed folk often needed 50% more levemir than lantus; so be prepared to escalate dose. Levemir might be marginally more consistent than lantus - a useful factor.
Click to expand...
Simon, in terms of "consistency" I'd use the absorption data that was collected back in around 2004. Lantus and NPH are very similar in terms of variability of absorption, in that they are both really quite variable, whereas Levemir was shown to be a lot less variable and much more consistent in how it is absorbed (research paper here and the 2004 ADA article). Tresiba also benefits from this.

There's certainly a lot of evidence that people often need more (although I didn't find this to be the case).
 
tim2000s said:
Simon, in terms of "consistency" I'd use the absorption data that was collected back in around 2004. Lantus and NPH are very similar in terms of variability of absorption, in that they are both really quite variable, whereas Levemir was shown to be a lot less variable and much more consistent in how it is absorbed (research paper here and the 2004 ADA article). Tresiba also benefits from this.

There's certainly a lot of evidence that people often need more (although I didn't find this to be the case).
Click to expand...

Thanks - that is interesting. Clinically, the Fritsche paper showed am lantus better than pm lantus better than pm NPH both in terms of HbA1c reduction and fewer hypos (so the difference in am and pm lantus shows it is not a smooth 24 hour profile) - this was in T2DM. You don't have the refernce for the 2004 data? I totally agree that levemir is a bit less variable than lantus.
 
@Lynz84 for what it's worth, this is the difference between the two for me. The last month of Lantus:

ScreenShot2015-02-08at120917_zps3d3d31c5.png

The first month of Levemir:
ScreenShot2015-02-08at120859_zps00a32b4b.png

The key thing was that my broader range of values tracked the median with Levemir, whereas with Lantus, it was much less correlated.
 
SimonCrox said:
You don't have the refernce for the 2004 data? I totally agree that levemir is a bit less variable than lantus.
Click to expand...
The 2004 ADA article was the publishing of the paper. You should find the references within that.
 
tim2000s said:
@Lynz84 for what it's worth, this is the difference between the two for me. The last month of Lantus:

ScreenShot2015-02-08at120917_zps3d3d31c5.png

The first month of Levemir:
ScreenShot2015-02-08at120859_zps00a32b4b.png

The key thing was that my broader range of values tracked the median with Levemir, whereas with Lantus, it was much less correlated.
Click to expand...
Hi Tim2000

Thanks so much for this!!!
 
Back
Top