Libre 2 accuracy

mmohan

Newbie
Messages
4
Type of diabetes
Type 2
Hi, this is my first post here. I started using libre 2 sensor two weeks ago. Yesterday I was feeling low so when I checked my libre 2 it was showing 4.2 but I was feeling very low so I decided to check using my meter and I was shocked to see it showing 2.7
On the other end of the scale today my liber 2 was showing 20.7 so I decided to check with my meter and I was shocked to see it showing 24.7!
I'm now wondering how accurate is libre 2 and can I rely on it?
 

JTF04

Member
Messages
14
Hi. I think the CGM and finger prick method measure blood glucose in slightly different ways. The CGM runs up to 15 minutes behind the finger prick reading so it probably accounts for the difference. They are fairly accurate but do advise you to double check reading with finger prick if feeling low. Hope that helps!
 

In Response

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,506
Type of diabetes
Type 1
Treatment type
Pump
I wish DSNs and CGM vendors would be more honest about their limitations and it wasn't left to word of mouth.

The areas of inaccuracies you have noticed, are known. CGMs are inaccurate at high and low readings which is why it is recommended to check before treating (unless you are experiencing an obvious hypo).

But there are other limitations
- Insertion trauma - some of us find the readings can be inaccurate for up to 48 hours after inserting a sensor. This is due to our body reacting to an alien object in our arm. This is why some of us insert a new sensor a day or two before activating it.
- compression lows. When pressure is applied to a sensor, it can block off flow to the filament resulting in a false low reading. This is most common at night when we lie on our arm when asleep.
- standard meter accuracy. All glucose meters sold in the UK must comply with a standard to be within 15% of the "true" reading 95% of the time. Therefore, your 20.7 and 24.7 could be reporting in the same reading of 22 and still comply with this standard
- predicting current readings. CGMs do not read BG, they read interstitial fluid and convert this to BG. However, changes in BG are reflected in changes in interstitial fluid 15 minutes later. Libre takes this into consideration by "predicting" the current readings through extrapolation of the current trend. So your Libre will show approximately the current readings and us NOT the reason for the inaccuracies you mentioned . This prediction works most of the time except when the trend direction changes in the past 15 minutes such as recovering from a hypo. This has two impacts: a prediction maybe overwritten so you may see a high value which disappears from a graph; hypos appear to take longer to recover from.

These are all reasons why it is important to check CGM readings with finger pricks especially when high, low or you do no "feel" what it is reporting.
 

mmohan

Newbie
Messages
4
Type of diabetes
Type 2
Thanks for this comprehensive reply, much appreciated. Yes these readings were on the first day when I inserted my new sensor and I think the readings have now stabilised
 

Jasmin2000

Well-Known Member
Messages
95
Type of diabetes
Type 1
Treatment type
Insulin
You're seeing the lag between true BG from finger pricks / glucometer and sensor glucose calculations, as others described. What you see in BG is 10-25 mins ahead of your CGM.

Note also that when your CGM changes rapidly up or down, the values may be corrected later by the algorithm and that high you saw is no longer on your LibreView curve.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EllieM