Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to Thread
Guest, we'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the
Diabetes Forum Survey 2024 »
Home
Forums
Diabetes Discussion
Type 1 Diabetes
Libre (in)accuracy on HBA1C
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="barrym" data-source="post: 2145101" data-attributes="member: 70535"><p>Can't understand why anyone bothers with HbA1c now that we have CGMs. With HbA1c you can on theory get s good reading whilst having lots of hypos and corresponding hypers. It is just a clever weighted average. It was ok when it was all we had, but now you can get a time in target which is much more useful, IMHO anyway.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="barrym, post: 2145101, member: 70535"] Can't understand why anyone bothers with HbA1c now that we have CGMs. With HbA1c you can on theory get s good reading whilst having lots of hypos and corresponding hypers. It is just a clever weighted average. It was ok when it was all we had, but now you can get a time in target which is much more useful, IMHO anyway. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post Reply
Home
Forums
Diabetes Discussion
Type 1 Diabetes
Libre (in)accuracy on HBA1C
Top
Bottom
Find support, ask questions and share your experiences. Ad free.
Join the community »
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn More.…