Thank you for your kind words @Antje77 ! I will definitely share the results with youHi @angela.lou , what an interesting subject to study!
English is not my first language, but as an active member and former moderator on this forum I mainly 'have diabetes in English'. After all, I'm seeing the forum every day and my Dutch diabetes nurse and endo only once a year.
I'm very interested in all things to do with language, are you planning to share the results of your research?
I'd love to read it.
Good luck with your project!
I think both of these are more often used by T2's who are largely managing their diabetes with diet than by T1's, interesting.Diabetes is a very individual disorder. Diabetics often speak of their personal journey to better blood glucose control and, to continue the metaphor, finding a path to good health.
If you are comfortable with your posts being part of my research, there is no need for any action. Your contributions will remain in the dataset. If, on the other hand, you prefer that your posts are not included in my analysis, please contact me on the forum directly by 13th November. I will promptly remove your contributions from the dataset, ensuring your privacy and preferences are respected.
Your participation is entirely voluntary, and your decision will not affect your standing in the forum community. Your insights are valuable, and your privacy is a priority.
Thank you for this observation @Rokaab! Research shows that when people are aware that they are being observed, or that they produce language in a researcher-initiated environment, their contributions might be different or at least affected by the fact that they are being observed. So after loooong discussions with the ethics and my research supervisor, I decided to use posts from the past, rather than initiate new discussions tailored to specific questions I would ask you. This is a standard practice in linguistics, but I completely understand your concerns!Just as a query, should this not be an opt-in rather than having to message to opt-out - especially given the title of the thread may mean many may not even see the post as they may not think its applicable to them?
I would agree with your ethics committee and Carson that this is an ethical way of obtaining data.Thank you for this observation @Rokaab! Research shows that when people are aware that they are being observed, or that they produce language in a researcher-initiated environment, their contributions might be different or at least affected by the fact that they are being observed. So after loooong discussions with the ethics and my research supervisor, I decided to use posts from the past, rather than initiate new discussions tailored to specific questions I would ask you. This is a standard practice in linguistics, but I completely understand your concerns!
Do you think I should change the title or post this elsewhere?
Your title, and the thread location have been approved, as has the research.Do you think I should change the title or post this elsewhere?
If data will be obtained by this forum only, the likely conclusion will be that diabetics have an unusual preference for the use of asterisks compared to the general public, and also an unusual aversion to the use of any words that can be seen as profanity or cursing.it seems to me that your research will lose a significant part of the data due to the fact that many people talk about their diabetes in words that would be turned into *** by this forum
I hardly speak English, but I would love to read your research
For 45 years I have referred to diabetes as The Old B***! Find that in a dictionary!If data will be obtained by this forum only, the likely conclusion will be that diabetics have an unusual preference for the use of asterisks compared to the general public, and also an unusual aversion to the use of any words that can be seen as profanity or cursing.
I'm not sure why you think T3C doesn't exist in Australia, it most certainly does. Here are some Australian links on it: https://www.adea.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Abbott-Case-Study-Competition-booklet-2022.pdf (page 70), https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/concern-type-3-diabetes-being-misdiagnosed/wyudx0fkq, https://endocrinology.medicinetoday...sed-pancreatic-dysfunction-what-you-need-know, https://www.elitegc.com.au/2017/11/08/breaking-news-a-new-type-of-diabetes/I don't know if I even have type 1 diabetes. Five (yes, five now) endocrinologists have said that that I do NOT have T2 and I am therefore T1. I'm happy with that diagnosis which is why I changed my type from 3c to type 1. Type 3c doesn't exist in my country (Australia). Just T1 and T2
I initially thought it related only to type 1. Perhaps that part of the title could be amended as I’m sure I’m not alone in thisDo you think I should change the title or post this elsewhere?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?