• Guest - w'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the 2025 Survey »

liraglutide is more effective....suggest NN study

Cowboyjim

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,294
http://www.novonordisk.com/press/se...fb6-aa0a-01c71dda7096&sShowLanguageCode=en-GB

News from Novo - some serious actual science for a change maybe? NN is really pushing the boat out on this one... 8)

This new study retrospectively analysed clinical trial data, which included 1,530 patients with type 2 diabetes, using recursive partitioning analyses to identify factors that predict greatest therapeutic benefit in response to treatment with liraglutide. Responders in the study were defined as those patients achieving a composite endpoint of HbA1c<7% with no weight gain and no hypoglycaemia over 26 weeks.

Key findings from the study include:
Overall 34% of individuals treated with liraglutide 1.8 mg achieved the prespecified composite endpoint in the retrospective analysis.

More patients with HbA1c<8.5% at the start of the study reached the composite endpoint, compared to patients with HbA1c=8.5%, 46% vs19% responders, respectively (p<0.0001).

More patients with HbA1c<8.5% at the start of the study and who had previously received treatment with a single antidiabetic medicine or diet modification reached the composite endpoint, compared to those who had received combination therapy (56% vs 36% responders, respectively, p<0.0001).

In another subgroup of female patients, more patients with HbA1c<8.5% at the start of the study, previous treatment with a single antidiabetic medicine or diet modification and a shorter duration of diabetes (<4.9 years) reached the composite endpoint, compared to patients with a longer duration of diabetes (=4.9 years), 74% vs 49% responders, respectively (p=0.013).



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liraglutide
 
As one who hurls the Victoza lance into his abdomen each morning at 8am, I am pleased to read the above; but it is of course, addressing the already converted
I have been injecting since my surgery wanted a 'victim' to try it on :wink: and ever since we have both been very pleased with the results :thumbup: :clap:
2+ yrs later and it is still doing what I need it to and long may it do so :angel:
 
sad to say---for a little over a year i used victoza it was excellent-doctor was amazed readings were in normal ranges-we were all very excited--then after all that time with no changes to my routine my readings started creeping up again, then after some time there were no real benefits from using liraglutide/victoza no one understood why but it just stopped being effective-needless to say it was very frustrating & as i tried earlier to go on insulin, on recommendation i then pushed for insulin as i wanted to stop jerking around with meds that didn't really have a lasting effect, more poor cells needed a break--on lantus 60units for about a month now and hoping finally to get normalized & also considering the newcastle diet lo cal.. will see--so i am reporting here that victoza was after all a big disappointment (for me that is) in the end.
 
Interesting and entirely different postings... just goes to show that we iz all individuals and a one-size-fits-all approach is not the solution.

Studies must use a good size sample to be valid which obviously increases the cost and time. But within the usual bell-curve spread there will cases like this I am afraid. It is how well it performs for the average, whoever that is, that will give the yay or nay.

Best wishes to you both!
8)
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn More.…