No direct knowledge, but my understanding is that smart watches and the like are not meant for control of diabetes . Only for play.
If you are serious about 24/7 monitoring of Blood glucose then get a CGM which measures interstitial blood glucose and only estimates blood Glucose.
But even they are only really good for trends and alerting if the trend is high or low- for more accuracy you still need a BG Meter.
I use a Garmin fenix 6 (though lots of the Garmin smart watches will work - just have to check compatibility with the ConnectIQ watchface that receives the data) which displays the values from XDrip+. I quite like the Garmin ecosystem and this works well for me. Battery life is very good, on the order of a week - I tend to pop it on charge for 20min when I get in the shower, and then wear it all day and all night.
Were it not for the cycling link to the Garmin ecosystem, I could be tempted by a Google Wear smartwatch (though the battery life would be an annoyance), but only if I were able to dispense with my phone completely and have the sensor talk to the watch directly (because it would be nice to not always have my phone in my pocket, especially when near water.)
Which health metrics are you interested in, I'd be tempted to look at that first, and then work out whether a given device can also display the data?
I hear good things about Apple watches too (but I guess no Apple user could possibly bad-mouth their investment) and these can also display the libre data (though this is now outside of my experience!)
Hi Simon,
The Garmin Fenix 6 is a bit too expensive for me. and looking at other Garmin's, they seem oriented towards sport. I am 73 and with my 2 recent operations, I need something geared more towards health. The Fitbit Sense and Galaxy 4 had heartrate, ECG, BP, SP02 & sleep amongst other apps. But the reviews on the Sense are quite bad with them breaking down and the Galaxy 4 not just the bad battery level it seems you have to ensure you are getting the correct version ie EU for me as it seems there are some sellers are claiming they are EU and send you a middle east or Asian version, which voids the warranty and you wont be able to receive any updates because your watch is in the wrong region.
I would like to get an Apple watch, but then I would have to buy an iphone as well, way out of my budget (which is around 200).
I just need to keep looking.
That's correct, Galaxy watches are generally best paired with Galaxy phones, and this applies to all Samsung watch versions:Do you have a Samsung phone, I read something about some of the features only working if you have one of their phones (or sideload their health app which comes pre-loaded).
It gets good reviews, it's one of the ones I considered. It's over £300 in the UK, not sure about EU pricing. If @Sizewell is looking in this price range, another option to consider is the latest Samsung Galaxy Watch 6 (£289 in the UK for the non-Classic version), plus some lower end Garmin options that @SimonP78 has outlined.Another option might be the TicWatch Pro 5, which looks like a decent bit of kit.
Most of the Garmins are oriented towards sport, though there are also some "fashion" type watches (though usually for ladies). There is a pretty wide range of styles and sizes for both men and women. The sport orientation doesn't matter though, you don';t need to use those features and by default they have more health related metrics such as HR, resting HR, SPO2, sleep tracking, stress tracking, etc., as these are also useful for sports recovery.
Something like the Garmin Vivoactive 4 is significantly cheaper and will still display the output from XDrip+, you may even be able to find a Vivoactive 3 somewhere online, though I'm not sure how well the battery will have fared without being charged while sat in a box waiting to be sold.
You can check compatibility with the watchface here (assuming that's the one you want to use, works for me):
The one caveat is that the Vivoactive range don't report overnight heart rate variability, which is something I find very useful to work out whether I'm recovered or not (cycling), though whether it's that useful if you're not doing that sort of activity I don't know. They do all tend to report a "stress" metric and "body battery" type display which is probably linked, I should check really.
For reference, there's a list of watches which do support HRV status here:
Regarding the other metrics, I don't find SPO2 particularly useful, it just sits there, perhaps it has a use if one suffers from sleep apnoea or is changing altitude significantly. I'm not sure how accurate write BP measurements are (not very afaiu), I think a cuff is still the gold standard.
Regarding Android watches, it looks like one can purchase a new Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 from Samsung themselves for ~£150. Do you have a Samsung phone, I read something about some of the features only working if you have one of their phones (or sideload their health app which comes pre-loaded). Another option might be the TicWatch Pro 5, which looks like a decent bit of kit.
Tic started the beta testing for Wear OS 3 in June this year, which was around the time I was looking. However, as you say, when beta becomes a release version is anyone's guess (as with most manufacturers in this space).But there has been a lot of promises from the company who makes them that it will be upgraded to Wear 0S 3 and give dates, but then don't keep to those dates. The next promise is 3Q 2023.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?