Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to Thread
Guest, we'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the
Diabetes Forum Survey 2024 »
Home
Forums
Diabetes Discussion
Diabetes Discussions
Low Carb Diets Dangerous
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Oldvatr" data-source="post: 1861228" data-attributes="member: 196898"><p>This is the source of that graph</p><p><a href="https://www.thelancet.com/action/showFullTableHTML?isHtml=true&tableId=tbl1&pii=S2468-2667%2818%2930135-X" target="_blank">https://www.thelancet.com/action/showFullTableHTML?isHtml=true&tableId=tbl1&pii=S2468-2667(18)30135-X</a></p><p></p><p>The reference level is 50% energy from carbohydrate. Results are adjusted for age, sex, race, ARIC test centre, total energy consumption, diabetes, cigarette smoking, physical activity, income level, and education. ARIC=Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities.</p><p></p><p>The study itself does own up to it being an extrapolation for the U curve conclusion a note that is lost when the graph is presented in isolation.</p><p>this is what they say</p><p><em>We created actuarial estimates of the age-specific probabilities of death according to each category of carbohydrate intake exposure, and used these estimates to obtain non-parametric age-based Kaplan-Meier estimates of the survival curve for participants at each year of age in each carbohydrate intake category (>65%, 55–65%, 50–55%, 40–50%, 30–40%, and <30%).</em></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Oldvatr, post: 1861228, member: 196898"] This is the source of that graph [URL]https://www.thelancet.com/action/showFullTableHTML?isHtml=true&tableId=tbl1&pii=S2468-2667%2818%2930135-X[/URL] The reference level is 50% energy from carbohydrate. Results are adjusted for age, sex, race, ARIC test centre, total energy consumption, diabetes, cigarette smoking, physical activity, income level, and education. ARIC=Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities. The study itself does own up to it being an extrapolation for the U curve conclusion a note that is lost when the graph is presented in isolation. this is what they say [I]We created actuarial estimates of the age-specific probabilities of death according to each category of carbohydrate intake exposure, and used these estimates to obtain non-parametric age-based Kaplan-Meier estimates of the survival curve for participants at each year of age in each carbohydrate intake category (>65%, 55–65%, 50–55%, 40–50%, 30–40%, and <30%).[/I] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post Reply
Home
Forums
Diabetes Discussion
Diabetes Discussions
Low Carb Diets Dangerous
Top
Bottom
Find support, ask questions and share your experiences. Ad free.
Join the community »
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn More.…