I have been asked to go in and speak to my GP about it because the DSN couldn't explain why when I challenged.
Based on the evidence I am familiar with there is a direct correlation between a increasing HBA1C and heart disease/ other complication risk. A quick Google search will support this.
Is anyone aware credible evidence that supports what the DSN has said?
ACCORD is about the most discredited study that you can find in relation to mortality in type 2 diabetics thanks to more than 90% of the participants in the intensive arm of the study being on Avandia, which as @Brunneriahas stated, has been banned by most countries due to the increased risk of heart failure.
Further to this, even the original researchers said that the results were inconclusive and further review of the data (http://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/33/5/983) showed that lower Hba1C was not co-incident with higher mortality.
People also tend to cite the Veteran's Study, which has the same issue - it used Avandia as well.
So the bottom line is that ACCORD actually proved that not lowering A1c was more likely to cause a heart attack.
The DCCT long term study unequivocally demonstrated that there is an exponential relationship between increased risk of complications and Hba1C level in Type 1 diabetes, in that once you get to around 6.5%, for every percentage point above that you go, you multiply the risk of complications relative to a non-diabetic (as per the graph below).
The ACCORD study that ended early due to unexpected higher levels of mortality in those treated intensively. It should be made very clear that this was a study primarily looking at CVD amongst Type 2s and used a drug in the intensive arm (primarily nearly 92% were taking Avandia, which is Rosiglitazone) which is no longer given to Type 2s due to the risk of heart attacks it induces. It is considered so dangerous that is was withdrawn from most global markets in 2010.
Hi @Martin864 - here's a few more pieces of reading for you in relation to Accord. Definitely worth sharing with the DSN as what she is saying is downright dangerous and worth reporting:
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?