I wouldn't mind, but I would never normally drink Pepsi or Coke. They are a bit too sickly for me and I'm not at all keen on the taste of sweeteners, so it was a poor choice all round really. I can just about tolerate diet lemonade, if I have a few slices of lemon in it.I know of woman whose nephew went out to eat and asked for diet coke. It was dispensed from one of those bar style pumps. She was assured it was diet coke - it wasn't. You can't trust anyone.
The trouble is, because I'm fat, I guess they'd assume it was because I'm on a slimming diet, so would think what does one matter.I have diet tonic and always ask to see the bottle - three times I've been shown the wrong type of bottle and each time the bar person has had alook on their face as I point out their mistake.
The trouble is, because I'm fat, I guess they'd assume it was because I'm on a slimming diet, so would think what does one matter.
Best to check. Bad attitude to something that can be serious.I have diet tonic and always ask to see the bottle - three times I've been shown the wrong type of bottle and each time the bar person has had alook on their face as I point out their mistake.
Yes it is, on @RosieLKH decision to drink Diet Pepsi.Not really. It's negligence.
I ordered a diet lemonade, which they didn't have, but they said they had diet Pepsi, so I had that. It tasted too sweet, so for my next drink I had soda water.
Just tested my BS - 14.1 !!! I'm so cross. I've been really strict with control recently and have apparently undone it all tonight. Grrrr!
Now that's interesting. That could be the case and I'm maligning the bar staff needlessly. I guess the only way to know is to buy some and try it, but I didn't like it, so perhaps won't bother.I found that Diet Pepsi made me really hi.
Are you saying that drinking diet Pepsi (which contains no sugar or other carbohydrates) can cause someone's blood glucose to go up to 14 mmol/l? If so, what mechanism would explain this?Yes it is, on @RosieLKH decision to drink Diet Pepsi.
I am not saying anything of the kind, so get that straight in your mind.Are you saying that drinking diet Pepsi (which contains no sugar or other carbohydrates) can cause someone's blood glucose to go up to 14 mmol/l? If so, what mechanism would explain this?
I appreciate what you're saying about 'buyer beware', Tipetoo, but I thought I was buying Diet Pepsi. I was told I was buying Diet Pepsi. Since it looks exactly the same as any other Pepsi I had to trust it was Diet Pepsi. I had consumed nothing unfamiliar, other than Diet Pepsi, which could have raised my BS. So it was either a) my personal reaction to a drink I never normally consume or b) it was full sugar Pepsi. I'll never know which, and it's a lesson learnt for me.I am not saying anything of the kind, so get that straight in your mind.
What I have said and put the relevant quotes in all along in this thread is that it was caveat emptor on @RosieLKH when she "agreed to purchase" the Diet Pepsi, instead of Diet Lemonade which the pub did not have.
It is not the pub staffs fault that it raised her bgls, which could have been caused from any thing that she may have consumed.
It's a caveat emptor situation @Chook.
I volunteer to work behind the bar at the bowls club I am a member of. I hold a Queensland RSA (Responsible Service of Alcohol) certificate that I understand the responsible sales of alcohol to people that are drunk, or sell to under age children (18). It does not say anything about soft drinks diet or otherwise.
I offer an alternative if we do not either have it stock, or do not sell the product. It is up to the customer to decide what he / she wants not me.
As I said it's caveat emptor, or the principle that the buyer alone is responsible for checking the quality and suitability of goods before a purchase is made.
Thank you for the clarification.I am not saying anything of the kind, so get that straight in your mind.
What I have said and put the relevant quotes in all along in this thread is that it was caveat emptor on @RosieLKH when she "agreed to purchase" the Diet Pepsi, instead of Diet Lemonade which the pub did not have.
It is not the pub staffs fault that it raised her bgls, which could have been caused from any thing that she may have consumed.
Thank you for the clarification.I am not saying anything of the kind, so get that straight in your mind.
What I have said and put the relevant quotes in all along in this thread is that it was caveat emptor on @RosieLKH when she "agreed to purchase" the Diet Pepsi, instead of Diet Lemonade which the pub did not have.
It is not the pub staffs fault that it raised her bgls, which could have been caused from any thing that she may have consumed.
The Consumer Rights Act 2015 requires that goods should be 'as described' so you have a right to complain if you were sold full sugar Pepsi which had been supplied as 'diet Pepsi'. However, that's probably little consolation once your blood glucose has shot up.I appreciate what you're saying about 'buyer beware', Tipetoo, but I thought I was buying Diet Pepsi. I was told I was buying Diet Pepsi. Since it looks exactly the same as any other Pepsi I had to trust it was Diet Pepsi. I had consumed nothing unfamiliar, other than Diet Pepsi, which could have raised my BS. So it was either a) my personal reaction to a drink I never normally consume or b) it was full sugar Pepsi. I'll never know which, and it's a lesson learnt for me.
I'm still a bit vague on all this. I just can't decide. Is it really caveat emptor?Thank you for the clarification.
The intended purchase of diet lemonade is a red herring. In the UK, the Consumer Rights Act 2015 requires that goods should 'as described'. If @Rosie LKH asked for diet Pepsi and was supplied with 'normal', non-diet Pepsi, the principle of caveat emptor does not apply as the goods have been misrepresented by the seller.
In practical terms a refund for mis-sold goods is of little consolation once
The Consumer Rights Act 2015 requires that goods should be 'as described' so you have a right to complain if you were sold full sugar Pepsi which had been supplied as 'diet Pepsi'. However, that's probably little consolation once your blood glucose has shot up.
From a practical point of view, some people take glucose test strips out with them and check diet drinks at the time they are served. This a) allows you to avoid drinking a sugar-laden drink inadvertently and b) alerts the bar staff to the error which may help prevent other people being mis-sold drinks as 'diet' drinks.
Ohh that's helpful. I didn't know you could do that. I never order drinks from the pump now, as I'm sure I've been given full sugar ones sometimes.Rosie - Some people choose to test their drinks, either using their blood glucose meter, or urine dip strips. That could help perhaps.
In the UK we have food allergy law, if you make staff aware you have a food intolerance/allergy and you become ill because they serve you the wrong food stuffs they are liable for prosecution.https://www.food.gov.uk/science/allergy-intoleranceIt's a caveat emptor situation @Chook.
I volunteer to work behind the bar at the bowls club I am a member of. I hold a Queensland RSA (Responsible Service of Alcohol) certificate that I understand the responsible sales of alcohol to people that are drunk, or sell to under age children (18). It does not say anything about soft drinks diet or otherwise.
I offer an alternative if we do not either have it stock, or do not sell the product. It is up to the customer to decide what he / she wants not me.
As I said it's caveat emptor, or the principle that the buyer alone is responsible for checking the quality and suitability of goods before a purchase is made.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?