Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to Thread
Guest, we'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the
Diabetes Forum Survey 2025 »
Home
Forums
Diabetes Discussion
Type 1 Diabetes
Mastering diabetes approach - I don't get it!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KennyA" data-source="post: 2755883" data-attributes="member: 517579"><p>Yes - the single-page paper you linked doesn't mention saturated fat at all. It's about LDL and ASCVD which is not really the same thing. </p><p></p><p>And it is also a review of evidence, not a single piece of research on "2 million" participants. Of course that paper, being published in 2017, a few years earlier than the one I linked, would have been available to the authors of the ACC paper. </p><p></p><p>So - if I have this right - the Journal of the American College of Cardiology says <em> "Most recent meta-analyses of randomized trials and observational studies found no beneficial effects of reducing SFA intake on cardiovascular disease (CVD) and total mortality, and instead found protective effects against stroke"</em> . You say they're wrong.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KennyA, post: 2755883, member: 517579"] Yes - the single-page paper you linked doesn't mention saturated fat at all. It's about LDL and ASCVD which is not really the same thing. And it is also a review of evidence, not a single piece of research on "2 million" participants. Of course that paper, being published in 2017, a few years earlier than the one I linked, would have been available to the authors of the ACC paper. So - if I have this right - the Journal of the American College of Cardiology says [I] "Most recent meta-analyses of randomized trials and observational studies found no beneficial effects of reducing SFA intake on cardiovascular disease (CVD) and total mortality, and instead found protective effects against stroke"[/I] . You say they're wrong. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post Reply
Home
Forums
Diabetes Discussion
Type 1 Diabetes
Mastering diabetes approach - I don't get it!
Top
Bottom
Find support, ask questions and share your experiences. Ad free.
Join the community »
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn More.…