Thanks for your answer @LittleGreyCat. I read @catapillar 's post, but it leaves me with more doubt about my son's diagnosis. I just checked his test results, and mind you, I am medically illiterate, but from what I see, there are four lines with results: Insulin-auto-antibodies (result <0.2); Islet-cell-antibodies (result <5); Glutamat. Decarbox At (GAD) with results <5.0 and tyrosine phosph. IA2 ICA512 -antibodies with a result <10.0.Waiting for a definitive answer from a T1 but I would guess that it is likely that your son is one of the 25% not GAD positive. [Thinks - was he tested for the full range of antibodies or just GAD?]
If his GAD and c peptide are normal, I would have no clue.Thanks for your answer @LittleGreyCat. I read @catapillar 's post, but it leaves me with more doubt about my son's diagnosis. I just checked his test results, and mind you, I am medically illiterate, but from what I see, there are four lines with results: Insulin-auto-antibodies (result <0.2); Islet-cell-antibodies (result <5); Glutamat. Decarbox At (GAD) with results <5.0 and tyrosine phosph. IA2 ICA512 -antibodies with a result <10.0.
In my understanding these are all negative results confirming the lack of antibodies, and if my logic is correct, my son's diabetes in not autoimmune. If so, it might be a type 1b, but that one is hereditary, and we have no type 1 in the family.... so, yeah...
If his GAD and c peptide are normal, I would have no clue.
Is his control good?Thanks @Kristin251 . Yes, they seemed quite normal. I will anyway insist on a new test in December. And, no, he is not on any medications.
Is his control good?
I had a very nasty virus about 8 years ago and that was the first time I heard I had high bs (280). So I immediately got a meter and started testing. I was able to maintain good control for 5 years and then things changed. I had to exercise more, reduce food etc. I probably should have been ( and wished I was ) put on insulin much earlier. I guess to ME, if we need insulin we need insulin even if we can’t find a name, type or reason but it’s certainly worth digging into.
How long has he been on insulin?
That sounds great! It does seem he does need insulin and it wasn’t just some quirky thing. But getting to the bottom of it would probably give you some peace of mind. What are the docs saying are causing it?I would say. yes, his control is good, with hba1c of 5.6 this spring and 5.9 this summer. He has been on insulin since diagnosis, this January. Started with 30 units a day, which caused many hypos, and the past 6 months he's been on 2 units of novomix in the morning and 2 for dinner. Novorapid for lunch but only if his bs are higher than 6 mmol, which happens not too often.
Thanks for your answer @LittleGreyCat. I read @catapillar 's post, but it leaves me with more doubt about my son's diagnosis. I just checked his test results, and mind you, I am medically illiterate, but from what I see, there are four lines with results: Insulin-auto-antibodies (result <0.2); Islet-cell-antibodies (result <5); Glutamat. Decarbox At (GAD) with results <5.0 and tyrosine phosph. IA2 ICA512 -antibodies with a result <10.0.
In my understanding these are all negative results confirming the lack of antibodies, and if my logic is correct, my son's diabetes in not autoimmune. If so, it might be a type 1b, but that one is hereditary, and we have no type 1 in the family.... so, yeah...
That sounds great! It does seem he does need insulin and it wasn’t just some quirky thing. But getting to the bottom of it would probably give you some peace of mind. What are the docs saying are causing it?
If you are waiting on the results of a wider family genetic screening I wonder if to do that your doctor found some family history of diabetes? The genetic testing would be for MODY.
A strong honeymoon in a child with type 1 is fairly uncommon. But your son is taking insulin and a type 1s can and do honeymoon and continue to produce insulin for a while after diagnosis. If he needs insulin to keep his blood sugar in check then wishing it's not type 1 just because he's antibody negative is really just wishful thinking (which is totally understandable) because, as previously stated, 25% of type 1s are antibody negative.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?