Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to Thread
Guest, we'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the
Diabetes Forum Survey 2025 »
Home
Forums
Food and Nutrition
Low Calorie Diets
Modern Portion sizes
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="phoenix" data-source="post: 76785" data-attributes="member: 12578"><p>Before I got type 1, like many my weight was gradually creeping up, I lost the weigh because of diabetes. I'm now a lot more aware of how much I eat (and used to eat) my BG levels are fine but I'm very aware how easy it would be to creep up again.</p><p> I think we've got used to eating too much and one of the reasons for the general increase in weight in recent years is portion size. </p><p> The GI news reports a project where recipes in subsequent editions of a popular cookbook in the US were analysed</p><p></p><p></p><p>more here </p><p><a href="http://ginews.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">http://ginews.blogspot.com/</a></p><p>and just compare the average calories in the 1936 book (even if you add some on for potatoes and veg )with the calories in a meal at somewhere like a Harvester where one course can be over 1000 calories. see </p><p> <a href="http://www.harvester.co.uk/nutritional-information.html" target="_blank">http://www.harvester.co.uk/nutritional-information.html</a></p><p> </p><p>I've got a post war Marguerite Patten that my Granny used somewhere I'll have to compare it with my modern cookbooks.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="phoenix, post: 76785, member: 12578"] Before I got type 1, like many my weight was gradually creeping up, I lost the weigh because of diabetes. I'm now a lot more aware of how much I eat (and used to eat) my BG levels are fine but I'm very aware how easy it would be to creep up again. I think we've got used to eating too much and one of the reasons for the general increase in weight in recent years is portion size. The GI news reports a project where recipes in subsequent editions of a popular cookbook in the US were analysed more here [url]http://ginews.blogspot.com/[/url] and just compare the average calories in the 1936 book (even if you add some on for potatoes and veg )with the calories in a meal at somewhere like a Harvester where one course can be over 1000 calories. see [url]http://www.harvester.co.uk/nutritional-information.html[/url] I've got a post war Marguerite Patten that my Granny used somewhere I'll have to compare it with my modern cookbooks. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post Reply
Home
Forums
Food and Nutrition
Low Calorie Diets
Modern Portion sizes
Top
Bottom
Find support, ask questions and share your experiences. Ad free.
Join the community »
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn More.…