Lenny249
Member
- Messages
- 21
- Location
- North Cheshire
- Type of diabetes
- Type 2
- Treatment type
- Diet only
- Dislikes
- Too much noise. More than one person talking at once.
Hi @Lenny249 and welcome to the forum. The blood test which showed you are pre-diabetic was presumably the full HbA1c test where a vial of blood is taken from your arm for lab analysis. It shows your blood sugar levels over the last 8-12 weeks, and your bladder infection and possibly the antibiotics over the last 20 days might have raised the bs levels.
When you see your GP ask for a full printout of your test results. If you are pre-diabetic it will help to know your figures so that you know where you are starting from.
HbA1c test results are usually given in the HbA1c (IFCC) range. Below 42 is non-diabetic, 42-47 is pre-diabetic, 48 and above is diabetic.
If it is confirmed that you are pre-diabetic, don't get too stressed. You should be able to lower your bs levels to non-diabetic. Many of us on here have done that by adopting a Low Carbohydrate High Fat (LCHF) approach to eating. Starchy carbohydrates especially bread, potatoes, pasta, rice and beer turn to sugar in our bodies, so need to be avoided or limited.
Have a read round the threads to see how LCHF works and ask any questions you want to. The people on here are friendly and supportive and you will get a lot of good advice.
Edit: The course your doctor wants to send you on is probably one for newly diagnosed pre-diabetics or diabetics, usually a 'DESMOND' course. You can do a search using the 'SEARCH' box at top right hand corner to find information and opinions on these courses. I think it is worth going to but you have to be wary of the standard NHS advice about the 'Eatwell Plate' which advocates continuing to eat starchy carbs.
Do not Worry!I've been having some tests - urine and blood - as a result of a bladder infection. I was put on antibiotics for 20 days after it was discovered I had blood and nitrates in my urine. At the end of the antibiotics treatment I had to take a blood and further urine test. The day after handing in the urine sample I was contacted by the local surgery which stated that they had done a "dip" test prior to sending it to the hospital lab and sugar was discovered.
The original urine test prior to antibiotics didn't show any sugar. I was asked to go to the surgery and do a "finger prick test". This showed 4.9, which the nurse said was normal. The testers at the hospital found the urine sample to be normal.
This morning the doctor phoned me to state that as a result of the blood test I am in a "Prediabetic State" and need to make an appointment to go and see him. If I heard him correctly he said he would put me on a course etc.
It's obviously worrying but on the positive side he did say that my liver, kidneys etc showed no signs of problems.
Well, it's going to be a life changer that's for sure. Hopefully I'll gain some valuable advice from members on these forums.
Male aged 69, Caucasian, sensible eater, semi couch potato!
As a matter of interest how are posters ascertaining their BMI? I've always been a bit heavier than most people my own height, (even when fit as a fiddle) as I seem to have shorter arms & legs - that's my excuse and I'm sticking to it!
I eat loads of fruit, potatoes, vegetables, pulses (beans and lentils in stew), buy the cheapest muesli with no added salt or sugar and coat most foods with wheat bran.
So sorry to hear of your wife's stroke.I’ve relapsed!
Unfortunately a year ago this month my wife had a venus stroke and was admitted to hospital for 31 days.
As such, I’ve had to take on most if NOT all of the chores completed by my wife. Having found her on the bedroom floor following the stroke I’ve been reluctant to go out for my usual walks.
I had a HbA1c blood test on 26 September and the Dr asked me to make a telephone appointment to discuss the findings, this took place yesterday.
She told me my HbA1c reading was 50 and has booked me for a further test this Friday and will talk this through with me on Monday 17th October. (Quick turnaround, hey?)
Talking with her it would seem that the system has changed since I last had a conversation with a different doctor.
Previously the Dr said that if I reached a score of 48 (or above) for two consecutive years I would be classed as having Type Two Diabetes.
Yesterday the Dr said that that was NOT now the case. If my figure on Friday is above 48 I’ll be classed as having Type 2. Final.
She said that if the figure was the same, I could be put on medication. I asked if the medication would be short term, ie take the med, go back on my exercise routine, have a test in 6 months time and if I had a noticeable improvement I’d be taken off the medications. She said “No” and that if I go on the medications it’s for life! Pretty daunting!
As a matter of interest, once one is classed as Type Two, ie above 48 are higher figures worse than a lower figure in terms of health threats etc?
More than 20 years ago when I registered at the local surgery they carried out a “Well Man” examination which included a blood test. When the results came back the Dr drew me a graph stating that I was in the pre-diabetic group. At that time I was very fit, running 6 days out of 7 and spending lunch times in the gym. I’d also had a civil service health assessment and they placed me in the top 5%. I wonder if I am one of those who are destined to be diabetic?
Good One!( However I just see it as a word, not a sentence)
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?