Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to Thread
Guest, we'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the
Diabetes Forum Survey 2024 »
Home
Forums
Food and Nutrition
Low Calorie Diets
ND DiRECT updates
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bulkbiker" data-source="post: 1934977" data-attributes="member: 219467"><p>The thing I found most interesting about the extra info is mainly found in table S4 in the Supplementary Appendix namely that of the 138 subjects in the ND arm only 40 (29%) managed to get what we would call into remission (HbA1c lower than 42mmol/l) . Of which 1 was still on oral meds after 1 year. Even more interesting is that 7 out of 148(4.7%) in the control arm (i.e. regular advice) managed to get there too including 1 on no meds whatsoever.. No-one has explained how that happened.. So if we were looking for an NHS revision of diagnosis to T2 in remission then the study only had 29% success rate. I wonder if that would have gone down so well if it had been better publicised... I wonder if we'll get this level of detail in the 2 year follow up....?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bulkbiker, post: 1934977, member: 219467"] The thing I found most interesting about the extra info is mainly found in table S4 in the Supplementary Appendix namely that of the 138 subjects in the ND arm only 40 (29%) managed to get what we would call into remission (HbA1c lower than 42mmol/l) . Of which 1 was still on oral meds after 1 year. Even more interesting is that 7 out of 148(4.7%) in the control arm (i.e. regular advice) managed to get there too including 1 on no meds whatsoever.. No-one has explained how that happened.. So if we were looking for an NHS revision of diagnosis to T2 in remission then the study only had 29% success rate. I wonder if that would have gone down so well if it had been better publicised... I wonder if we'll get this level of detail in the 2 year follow up....? [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post Reply
Home
Forums
Food and Nutrition
Low Calorie Diets
ND DiRECT updates
Top
Bottom
Find support, ask questions and share your experiences. Ad free.
Join the community »
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn More.…