New approach could better predict coronary artery disease in people with type 2 diabetes

[DCUK NewsBot]

Genetic analysis could be used to determine whether someone with type 2 diabetes is at risk of developing coronary artery disease (CAD). Joslin Diabetes Center scientists in the US say that adding genetics to future analyses could help further predict someone’s CAD risk better than existing methods. There are currently established indicators for CAD risk within type 2 diabetes, such as weight, blood glucose levels, cholesterol, blood pressure and smoking history. CAD is the most common type of heart disease and people with diabetes are more likely to develop it. However, keeping blood glucose levels within a healthy range, eating a low sugar diet and getting regular exercise can lower this risk. Until recently, it was thought that looking at various genetic factors did very little to indicate who might be at risk. But the new Joslin study changed that. The researchers looked at genetic risk scores taken from 160 gene locations found within people with CAD. They then compared the results with other findings, which were generated from two different type 2 diabetes studies: the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) trial and the Outcome-Reduction with an Initial Glargine Intervention (ORIGIN) trial. They found that genetic scores can help predict future major coronary incidents before weight gain or increased cholesterol becomes apparent. This could be significant as people could seek treatment earlier, although the scores are not able to recommend the best course of action in prevention. Dr Alessandro Doria, who worked on the study and is from Joslin's Section on Epidemiology and Genetics, said: "The effect is not dramatic, but it is much better than what we expected." The findings have been published in Diabetes Care.

Continue reading...

 

[kitedoc]

I am always in two minds about genetic research.
It can help explain why things happen but in itself does nothing to help prevent what is predicted from happening.
If for example I am screened early in life and are told we have an X% chance of coronary heart disease, does that motivate me to work on reducing environmental influences or just make me worry from then on?
And we are talking about statistics which are oft quoted as 'born liars'.