I am sorry if I have caused any confusion. Please let me try to clarify...
What I am interested in are the experiences of people who have to live day-to-day with Diabetes type 1 (what problems it causes, the challenges they face, hopes and fears - whatever people think that diabetes is or isn't for them). I don't want to be too leading, the point of the research is to try and give diabetics the opportunity to relay their own perceptions and opinions without taking a checklist format of 'are you worried about x?'... 'does your diabetes affect y?'.
Of course, anyone is going to be interested in having new and effective treatments produced - that goes without saying. But the extent to which any treatment has value to an individual depends upon what it influences. If you had a hypothetical drug that gave say, improved glycaemic control it could potentially influence many factors directly and indirectly (decreased chance of complications, increased dietary freedom, decreased anxiety, increased exercise capacity etc). Without understanding what it is that diabetes is or does to people, you cannot ever make a sensible assessment of what change may arise as a result of a treatment. We are tying to capture a picture of the condition from the perspective of people who have to live with it. It is all too easy for a doctor to look at your Hb1Ac and go 'you are fine'. It is not really representative of the human experience and does a disservice to patients who have to endure significant hardship as a result of a disease they have through no fault of their own.
I hope this helps make things clearer. Please feel free to ask any questions or contact me at the number in the original post.
Paul