Was it the QRISK test @Jowen?Hello everyone
I did this Heart Age Calculator from the NHS. It showed my Heart Age as 95! Not long to go then, eh? I am 65 years old and really want to make my 80's at least! Has anyone else done the test? For me, it could frighten a few people - it had that affect on me, anyway. I thought that the NHS would be a safe bet to do these kind of things. Any thoughts?
Yes.Hello everyone
I did this Heart Age Calculator from the NHS. It showed my Heart Age as 95! Not long to go then, eh? I am 65 years old and really want to make my 80's at least! Has anyone else done the test? For me, it could frighten a few people - it had that affect on me, anyway. I thought that the NHS would be a safe bet to do these kind of things. Any thoughts?
Put in husbands details - his heart is older with diabetes rather than with smoking!
Sent from my SM-G900F using Diabetes.co.uk Forum mobile app
Recently in cardiac ward and in out-patients for coronary angiogram more smokers had damaged hearts than diabetics. Prediabetic woman had atherosclerosis like me. I think diabetics have more artery problems than heart pressure from smoking long and hard numerous times a day and forcing pressure to the heart chambers unnaturally.Put in husbands details - his heart is older with diabetes rather than with smoking!
Sent from my SM-G900F using Diabetes.co.uk Forum mobile app
I'll give it a missHello everyone
I did this Heart Age Calculator from the NHS. It showed my Heart Age as 95! Not long to go then, eh? I am 65 years old and really want to make my 80's at least! Has anyone else done the test? For me, it could frighten a few people - it had that affect on me, anyway. I thought that the NHS would be a safe bet to do these kind of things. Any thoughts?
Phew! You think I might see tomorrow then?But there is no reason for me to trust that, any more than I trust the rest of it.
Phew! You think I might see tomorrow then?
No.Hi. Most of these NHS algorithmic tests are daft and best ignored. Would you take too much advice from any organisation that recommends diabetics have lots of carbs in their meals?
I was shocked at how little impact smoking and weight had - the only thing that made the big jump in age was diabetes. I think it is suspect and has a hidden agenda. The nhs seems to favour scare tactics rather than education and innovationWow.
My actual age is 50
By tweaking things I could adjust my calculated heart age by over 10 years. but I question the validity of several of their assumptions.
there was no option to factor in Triglycerides in Cholesterol, so I think that figure/calc is deeply suspect.
they go for Total Cholesterol, with no recognition that the ratios are FAR more relevant than the total fig
there was also no option to state whether you are a controlled diabetic, or not, and nothing to assess the extent of insulin resistance.
the blood pressure treatment question is very vague - I mean, 'have you ever taken bp meds?' the possible answers for that are so varied that surely it makes the question pointless? PResumably 'yes for 3 months until I started exercising' would have different implications from 'yes, I am on 3 different meds for the last 15 years, and my bp is still uncontrolled'.
I did find it interesting that adjusting my weight from very obese to slim (a girl can wish) made astonishingly little difference compared with tweaking the (flawed) cholesterol numbers and the diabetes factors. But there is no reason for me to trust that, any more than I trust the rest of it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?