I can't comment on your doses or anything, but I just wanted to say that I hope this works out for you.Well, the dip in the BG last night was only to 3.8 so not too worried about that. Tonight I'm a bit worried - first glass of wine since being back on Insuman and I remember how wine + Insuman used to drop me pretty low, so I've cut the dose from 6.5 units to 6 units but I'm a bit worried I should have cut it further. I guess I'll see during the night - decided to set an alarm for an overnight test tonight.
Smidge
What do you all make of this latest on hypos and cardiovascular issues? I don't have any other details e.g. at what level they are considering hypo etc, but I thought given the discussions about normal BGs and hypos we've been having on this thread, it might be of interest.
http://www2.le.ac.uk/news/blog/2014...od-glucose-and-cardiovascular-events-revealed
Smidge
Yes, that's the million-dollar one. It's always stated that a lower HbA1c must increase hypos.The question that someone raised earlier is an interesting one. It was whether tighter control led to more hypos.
I think there are a couple of ways to look at it. One is that a lower Hba1c number statistically would suggest more hypos.
The second is that a tighter level of control doesn't have to, however it is a tighter level of control at all levels and therefore suggests significant lifestyle impacts.
Yes, that's the million-dollar one. It's always stated that a lower HbA1c must increase hypos.
So let's have a look at it. If that statement is true, then it's because either (a) a low A1c necessarily lessens hypo awareness, or (b) you can't have a low A1c without hypos, or both.
But (b) isn't true. As Smidge pointed out, A1c numbers aren't a mean, they're incremental: we acquire the glycosylated hemoglobin when we have lots of glucose bumping about in the blood, and only then. And we don't lose glycosylated cells/whatever after a hypo: we don't lose them at all till they die off. You could have as many hypos as you like (as it were), and it wouldn't knock a point off your A1c score. So hypos wouldn't show up in A1c at all, and you can't read hypos off an A1c measurement.
Why should people who haven't had lots of hypos lose hypo awareness? What other reasons would there be?
My consultant was involved in that trial .Hence his new advice to never go below 6 at any time .I already have heart problems .
Am I missing something here because it seems obvious that doctors would be far more concerned with hypos than raised bloods.You wake up dead with a really bad hypo compared to "possible" complications if the BG's remain raised for a significant period of months /years. I would expect my doctors to worry as no matter how well controlled you are just as you can spike for no reason you can hypo whilst sleeping .
It's interesting isn't it? Personally, I would question whether having a high proportion of 'normal' BGs really means you lose hypo awareness or whether actually, you return to having a 'normal' hypo awareness - i.e. the hypo awareness of a non-diabetic - i.e. very little (and we know that non diabetics do dip down into the 2s sometimes without them actually knowing it). Now, there is certainly an argument that insulin-dependent diabetics need hypo awareness, but that's a different question. Does the hypo awareness weaken because that is actually the natural condition for those with 'normal' BG levels?
I'm not saying this is the case, just asking whether people think it's a plausible theory - or are their other reasons.
Smidge
Dead in bed happens. It is rare fortunately but it has now been documented as occurring during hypoglycaemia using CGM
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/198335
It's interesting isn't it? Personally, I would question whether having a high proportion of 'normal' BGs really means you lose hypo awareness or whether actually, you return to having a 'normal' hypo awareness - i.e. the hypo awareness of a non-diabetic - i.e. very little (and we know that non diabetics do dip down into the 2s sometimes without them actually knowing it). Now, there is certainly an argument that insulin-dependent diabetics need hypo awareness, but that's a different question. Does the hypo awareness weaken because that is actually the natural condition for those with 'normal' BG levels?
I'm not saying this is the case, just asking whether people think it's a plausible theory - or are their other reasons.
Smidge
Yes. Because non-diabetics' livers will save them.
Yes, I have corrected it ,it seems that I lost some numbers on the way.Wrong link?
Dead in bed happens. It is rare fortunately but it has now been documented as occurring during hypoglycaemia using CGM
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19833577
Omg r u ok now?Ok people.
Let me give you a scenario.
A person has a level of 5.1 before having a very rare chinese with horrendous carbs in it.
This person does a big bolus for the chinese.
This person within 30 minutes is puling her guts up, seriously, really badly. Everything ate comes back up including the snack she had 3 hours earlier, what would you do?
This person was me on Sunday.
I knew I had to get glucose in me urgently as I had insulin still working from 3 hours earlier, I knew I had 14 units of bolus in me.
I gave myself a glucogon injection, a bottle of glucose gel, sweets and milk and sugar which all came back up again.
I knew I was going to go low, I tried to stop it, but the only thing I had working in me was one glugagon injection... Not enough and the coma came on very rapidly and nothing could stop it.
I slipped in to a coma. A very serious coma.
My hubby phoned ambulance as I was totally unconscious. They said to him to stay on phone and to check my breathing at all times, telling him exactly what to do.
When the 1st responders came out I was lifeless and the first thing they gave me was oxygen up the nose. Y oxygen levels had dropped dangerously low and this was there first priority.
One of them was relaying further details to ambulance. Ambulance when arrived minutes later gave me another glucagon injection and I started to come round. I recovered.
This was all due to bad food of some description but you need to be aware that circumstances like this happen.
I was aware that I needed to get glucose quickly. I was aware that I was hypo and there was nothing more that we could do. I had fortinately a glucagon injection and liquid glucose at home, but it wasn't enough..
For all people that keep their levels low, you must have glucose gel and a glucose injection at home and thankgod I had my hubby at home on his one day off and was with me.
I knew that I was in trouble but the soeed that the coma came on in this instance was too quick for me to call an ambulance.. I told my hubby to but by the time you think about injection, gel being sick etc there is not enough time.... I would have been in worse dire straights if I did not have the injection, the gel (lucozade tablets would have been useless) and my partner with me. I wouldn't have been able to get to the phone, let alone unlock the front door to let them in!!!
This is why you must have back up glucose in gel form, at least...
I run my levels between 5 and 7. I knew I was in trouble and there was nothing I could do about it.
You must have people aware what to do with glucose gel and injections.
Be aware that despite being at a reasonable level at 5.1 if I had been a tad higher then that 1st injection and glucogel may have stopped me going unconscious...
I hope that everybody else that tries to keep their levels under non diabetic bg levels and are on insulin will consider their lives and circumstances and what they have in the fridge like injection and gel before they pursue lower levels.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?