Treating the after effects of diabetes employs more people and funds research in hospitals. Comsultants and professors benefit from people being ill.My GP benefits from me being registered as T2D on his practice, which is why he wants me to aim for a blood glucose level above 7.2 mmol/l otherwise i come off his books as resolved or in remission. Diet plans and advice does not pay the bills.I read this post with disbelief!! The NHS would rather have phave to treat people with heart disease, blindness and amputations than provide them with a simple aid to help prevention?
I read this post with disbelief!! The NHS would rather have phave to treat people with heart disease, blindness and amputations than provide them with a simple aid to help prevention?
The fount of all wisdom relating to UK diet seems to be the SACN comittee. They control and advise on ~Eatwell, DVLA guidelines, The Commons Climate Change Comnittee (CCCG), the comittee tasked to reduce obesity, and many other aspects of our lives. ~I did find their membership list for one of the CCCG meetings, and it published their list of members interests that makes good reading. Unfortunately the file is too large to load here,When I think of the doctors, diabetes nurses, and the pharmacists on the front line of the no-SMBG policy (and therefore no funded BG test strips), from my own experience, I have to say - they really do seem to be coming from a postion of ignorance. And - lets not forget that ol' cognitive dissonance. They want to believe that self monitoring is really bad for us, and that Big Pharma is on our, the patients' side. Too awful to think otherwise? I get that.
And holding on to the idea that one miraculous day there will be a pill for this.
And I do wonder who they are asking to be a part of their SMBG studies. One of the obvious answers would support your theory @Jim Lahey, I do see that. I have said to my country doctor that he needs to ask people like me, and go on to this website, but he still prescribes me one pottle of BG test strips at a time (and therefore costs me a lot more money). I don't understand his reasoning. But he gave me a beautiful speech about him being on his patients' side, and I do believe him. He is just towing the line that the Ministry of Health supports - a quarter plate of glucose forming food a meal is the right way, and self testing is bad. We need to get governments to listen to us? People who are getting better with SMBG, or at least - not getting way worse? We need to be part of a loud lobby group in our different countries? Be one big international lobby group online?
The fount of all wisdom relating to UK diet seems to be the SACN comittee. They control and advise on ~Eatwell, DVLA guidelines, The Commons Climate Change Comnittee (CCCG), the comittee tasked to reduce obesity, and many other aspects of our lives. ~I did find their membership list for one of the CCCG meetings, and it published their list of members interests that makes good reading. Unfortunately the file is too large to load here,
SACN stands for Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition.
https://www.gov.uk/government/groups/scientific-advisory-committee-on-nutrition
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/sacn-statement-on-nutrition-and-older-adults
Good hunting.
Thanks JimBriefly, so as not to derail. If type 2 were encouraged to self test, it would blow the lid clean off the “base your diet on starchy carbohydrates” paradigm overnight. It’s an uncomfortable truth, but there are powerful forces involved who want us to to remain diabetic and continue to eat the foods that put us there while maintaining the lie that it’s all about sugar, fat and calories. The status quo must not be threatened. No one cares how much it costs the NHS. It’s taxpayer funded and the spoils go straight into the pockets of the same industries who lobby it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?