Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to Thread
Guest, we'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the
Diabetes Forum Survey 2025 »
Home
Forums
Food and Nutrition
Low-carb Diet Forum
Now the X-PERT advice is low carb, high fat
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AndBreathe" data-source="post: 735638" data-attributes="member: 88961"><p>I'm pretty certain that the reality will be that Dr Deakin was contracted to deliver a piece of work (the course), and probably a "Train the Trainer" programme, then it will have been handed over to the HCPs who routinely deliver to the likes of us. From that point, the NHS will be licensed to deliver said course, with a license fee being payable to X-PERT Health under certain circumstances (probably per course delivered to delegates).</p><p></p><p>By now Dr Deakin can say or do anything she pleases, but whilst the course remains compliant, there will be no compulsion for the NHS to require it to be changed. She has effectively sold the course on (OK, she is likely to retain intellectual property rights on it). A licensing arrangement is often an exceptionally profitable business model.</p><p></p><p>At the point changes are required, it is likely NHS Procurement will require a tender process of some sort, which will add further months to the process, before any real engagement. As I say, I won't be holding my breath. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite3" alt=":(" title="Frown :(" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":(" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AndBreathe, post: 735638, member: 88961"] I'm pretty certain that the reality will be that Dr Deakin was contracted to deliver a piece of work (the course), and probably a "Train the Trainer" programme, then it will have been handed over to the HCPs who routinely deliver to the likes of us. From that point, the NHS will be licensed to deliver said course, with a license fee being payable to X-PERT Health under certain circumstances (probably per course delivered to delegates). By now Dr Deakin can say or do anything she pleases, but whilst the course remains compliant, there will be no compulsion for the NHS to require it to be changed. She has effectively sold the course on (OK, she is likely to retain intellectual property rights on it). A licensing arrangement is often an exceptionally profitable business model. At the point changes are required, it is likely NHS Procurement will require a tender process of some sort, which will add further months to the process, before any real engagement. As I say, I won't be holding my breath. :( [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post Reply
Home
Forums
Food and Nutrition
Low-carb Diet Forum
Now the X-PERT advice is low carb, high fat
Top
Bottom
Find support, ask questions and share your experiences. Ad free.
Join the community »
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn More.…