samowen268
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 103
- Type of diabetes
- Type 1
- Treatment type
- Insulin
Hi all, this is a very random question but I hadn't heard of this before, apparently it is possible for a pancreas transplant procedure to ultimately eliminate the need of insulin injections, has anyone ever heard of this or know anyone who has experienced a successful transplant?? Blew my mind haha.
I find these types of threads very interesting!
@catapillar, you mentioned alpha cell regeneration in T1's although we only ever really hear about beta cell destruction when it comes to T1. Are there T1's who have shot alpha cells also?
Another question I'll throw out (and I don't mean to derail) is would the pancreas go back to normal if the autoimmune response that kills the beta cells was eliminated? As I understand the beta cells are still made but quickly destroyed by the immune system. Are our pancreases totally inoperative or simply rendered useless because of an autoimmune onslaught?
Interesting
Your analogy is, erm, different @Jaylee - I'll give you thatGood question.. I assumed they haven't got to the bottom of the autoimmune thing in T1, thus to draw an analogy; a transplant would be like someone new walking into a club, getting beaten up, then having constantly to show ID to avoid getting thrown out by short memory'd security .....???
Eliminating the auto immune response makes sense on so many levels...
Your analogy is, erm, different @Jaylee - I'll give you that
Transplants aside, my query is mainly with regards to our existing organs - which we know aren't working right (or more to the point: aren't allowed to work right) due to the autoimmune thingy ma-bob.
So if the T1 autoimmune riot was to be stopped by "the miracle fix", could our pancreases carry on like nothing had even happened? Or is there a hefty element of irreversible damage?
I appreciate that may be an impossible question to answer and why I really don't want to derail this thread. Apologies in advance @samowen268Just let me know if this isn't appropriate to your thread!
@catapillar, you mentioned alpha cell regeneration in T1's although we only ever really hear about beta cell destruction when it comes to T1. Are there T1's who have shot alpha cells also?
Hi all, this is a very random question but I hadn't heard of this before, apparently it is possible for a pancreas transplant procedure to ultimately eliminate the need of insulin injections, has anyone ever heard of this or know anyone who has experienced a successful transplant?? Blew my mind haha.
I know nothing about transplants but I have quite a lot of experience with immune suppressant drugs. Sooner or later they lose their effectiveness. The body is very good at getting its way even when that way is destructive. I have been on amevive, humira, cyclosporin, embrel, remicade, and now stelara which is slowly losing its effectiveness after 3 years. They almost all seemed to have about a 3 year span of effectiveness. I was on the max dose of methotrexate throughout all of these drugs to prevent my system becoming immune to them. It did not work. There are significant side effects to all of these drugs including cancer. Something to think about.
And I forgot to say, they are all administered by injection or IV
I have experience of both transplant and immuno suppressants and disagree with your post (which, fair enough, may be your personal experience but it's not mine). Following a transplant over 2 years ago, I have been on drugs to suppress my immune system and none of them have been administered by injection or IV. While, it can be argued that these drugs lose their effectiveness sooner or later, there is also evidence of the effect of certain drugs lasting a very long time indeed. In Scotland, some of the drugs mentioned above are no longer used as anti-rejection meds for transplant patients while they may well be issued for other things. My main immuno suppressant is Prograf (or Tacrolimus), a very effective and flexible drug. I regularly attend clinics for blood tests and the dosage of this drug in particular is tweaked depending on the increase or decrease of certain levels. The approach to how an individual's post-transplant treatment is handled has progressed greatly in recent years and the way in which the performance of anti-rejection drugs is monitored in the individual now differs greatly from the one-size-fits-all, just take the meds and good luck approach that has been kicked into touch. As for the significant side effects...a] I have experienced none of the possible side effects that can be associated with the drugs, and b] those in need of a transplant have no option! I would rather not think about the possibility of cancer, thanks, or of meds failing as I instead choose to be positive in my attitude to my transplant...further, I am pretty sure that one hell of lot of people get cancer whether they take these drugs or not...no? Nothing is perfect.
As I said, I know nothing about transplants or the drugs to stop rejection. The drugs I mentioned are the ones that I have personal experience with for autoimmune conditions, several of them. I was speaking more in terms of stopping the autoimmune attack that caused type 1 in the first place and stopping the body from attacking a new pancreas and causing type 1 to develop again. I was not speaking about anti rejection drugs. I guess I should have been clearer.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?