M
I don't think so. I was merely using it as a shorthand. From the definitions: a poison causes illness or death (so I concluded poisons are "harmful", which still seems reasonable).You selected the part of the definition you liked.
The actual quote from David Unwin was:We do not know what David Unwin means when he says "poison" I believe we can with a high degree of certainty presume that it is poison as it is commonly accepted to be lethal. Similarly with Prof Kar's response I believe in this context he is also talking about the commonly accepted definition of poison as lethal.
There is a big difference between "sort of metabolic poison" and poison.The actual quote
I hadn't attributed anything to David Unwin in this thread.There is a big difference between "sort of metabolic poison" and poison.
Honesty this who thread has been like herding cats.
One was a lecture and the other a newspaper interview - not merely in conversation.The premise that "So, essentially something that causes harm." is making assumptions that both men agree on this to be the definition, which is highly unlikely when "poison" is used in conversation.
Look at your OP.I hadn't quoted David Unwin in this thread.
It looks like apparently you made a false assumption, judging from your reaction.
I assumed you were not quoting the banana's.From that infamous Mail on Sunday article about David Unwin and bananas, we have the quote
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?