The problem with that approach is that we are unaware of what is going on in our bodies until we have symptoms. That may be too late as symptoms mean damage.SilverAndEbony said:I think the idea is that you get in tune with how your body is feeling. So that you can recognise a hypo, or hyper, without testing your blood. Which is a good idea, when you think about it.
If you're able to recognise when your blood glucose levels are getting low you can do something about it before it gets to the stage when you have a 'bad' hypo. I don't know if that holds true for type 1s, but it's what I was told in relation to type 2s.
It's like a lot of things, don't rely on things you can't always test, but get to know how your body feels. It's the same principle as testing your blood to check what foods affect your BG how. When you've worked out what food causes problems with your glucose control, you don't have to test it every time you eat it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?