Hello forum,
I'd be interested in anyone's thoughts on this (in advance of me discussing with my new GP on Monday):
* 42yo male. No family history of diabetes at all.
* Blood test in May 2011 showed HbA1c of about 9.5% and sharply elevated blood glucose (17ish IIRC). Repeat test a couple of days later showed virtually the same results.
* GP immediately said "this is type 2 diabetes - here's a prescription for 1500mg of metformin daily". I was gutted & quite angry too (although I'm not sure what or who the object of my anger was - probably me, for allowing myself go to seed so badly).
* Took the metformin - some stomach cramping for the first month or so but otherwise well tolerated, no side effects.
* Repeat blood test 3 months later showed HbA1c down to 6.3%. Repeat blood test another 3 months later showed HbA1c down further to 6.1%.
GP happy with the fall in the numbers but then started talking about cholesterol, statins, etc. He seem very keen to medicate aggressively (I eventually was able to convince him via home monitoring that my BP is ok).
A number of unanswered questions in my mind:
* in the period running up to the diagnosis, I was - for various reasons (long and boring story) not taking care of myself at all. I was smoking, drinking very heavily and my diet suffered too. And I took almost no exercise - a walk to the end of the street was a major outing. I rarely got out of bed, in fact - didn't wash, didn't change clothes, didn't clean my flat, empty the bins, etc. - nothing.
* I never had any of the textbook symptoms except - for some reason - a period of about 2 weeks where I was unexpectedly extremely thirsty, drinking 12-15 pints of liquid daily (and peeing like a racehorse!). This resolved itself quite quickly though, but I still don't know what caused it. It coincided with stopping smoking, but I've no reason to think that the two are causally linked.
* I was also taking duloxetine, a med which I've heard can cause blood sugar levels to rise
* I've been led to believe that the metformin wouldn't by itself cause such a big fall in blood sugar as that that I've observed
* I was never offered a glucose tolerance test
* I've read since that some cases of hyperglycemia can be temporary, transient - caused by infections, stress, medications, etc.
* I've quit smoking, become much more physically active (can now walk 20+ miles), tightened up on my diet (very low carb) and - with a few rare exceptions - I've stopped drinking alcohol. I've lost weight too (inevitably I suppose, given the other changes I've made).
I'm left wondering if there is a bit of a question mark over the T2 diagnosis. Could I have a point here, or am I just in denial & desperately clutching at straws?! Is there any sense in which type 2 diabetes is 'temporary', partially or completely reversible, etc.?
Thanks
Alan
I'd be interested in anyone's thoughts on this (in advance of me discussing with my new GP on Monday):
* 42yo male. No family history of diabetes at all.
* Blood test in May 2011 showed HbA1c of about 9.5% and sharply elevated blood glucose (17ish IIRC). Repeat test a couple of days later showed virtually the same results.
* GP immediately said "this is type 2 diabetes - here's a prescription for 1500mg of metformin daily". I was gutted & quite angry too (although I'm not sure what or who the object of my anger was - probably me, for allowing myself go to seed so badly).
* Took the metformin - some stomach cramping for the first month or so but otherwise well tolerated, no side effects.
* Repeat blood test 3 months later showed HbA1c down to 6.3%. Repeat blood test another 3 months later showed HbA1c down further to 6.1%.
GP happy with the fall in the numbers but then started talking about cholesterol, statins, etc. He seem very keen to medicate aggressively (I eventually was able to convince him via home monitoring that my BP is ok).
A number of unanswered questions in my mind:
* in the period running up to the diagnosis, I was - for various reasons (long and boring story) not taking care of myself at all. I was smoking, drinking very heavily and my diet suffered too. And I took almost no exercise - a walk to the end of the street was a major outing. I rarely got out of bed, in fact - didn't wash, didn't change clothes, didn't clean my flat, empty the bins, etc. - nothing.
* I never had any of the textbook symptoms except - for some reason - a period of about 2 weeks where I was unexpectedly extremely thirsty, drinking 12-15 pints of liquid daily (and peeing like a racehorse!). This resolved itself quite quickly though, but I still don't know what caused it. It coincided with stopping smoking, but I've no reason to think that the two are causally linked.
* I was also taking duloxetine, a med which I've heard can cause blood sugar levels to rise
* I've been led to believe that the metformin wouldn't by itself cause such a big fall in blood sugar as that that I've observed
* I was never offered a glucose tolerance test
* I've read since that some cases of hyperglycemia can be temporary, transient - caused by infections, stress, medications, etc.
* I've quit smoking, become much more physically active (can now walk 20+ miles), tightened up on my diet (very low carb) and - with a few rare exceptions - I've stopped drinking alcohol. I've lost weight too (inevitably I suppose, given the other changes I've made).
I'm left wondering if there is a bit of a question mark over the T2 diagnosis. Could I have a point here, or am I just in denial & desperately clutching at straws?! Is there any sense in which type 2 diabetes is 'temporary', partially or completely reversible, etc.?
Thanks
Alan