Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to Thread
Guest, we'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the
Diabetes Forum Survey 2024 »
Home
Forums
Food and Nutrition
Low-carb Diet Forum
Reducing our carbon footprint BY dairy farming...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Listlad" data-source="post: 2203526" data-attributes="member: 499223"><p>[USER=468524]@pdmjoker[/USER]</p><p></p><p>Cattle gases do not contribute to global warming. This is a fallacy. There is a good diagram which illustrates why. Any gases emitted are recycled. There is no net addition to gas levels generated. If no livestock is added then the figures do not change.</p><p></p><p>On the other hand gases (and oil) trapped within the earth, once released by man, are additional and not part of a short term cycle.</p><p></p><p>This is why meat should not be the target. And this is why any debate on the restriction of meat eating in environmental and global warming terms should include other contributing factors. There is a lot more to this that is relevant but am trying not to be seen to be crossing the thread boundary.</p><p></p><p>So in summary, we should not be restricting either form of farming at all. Equally there shouldn’t be a one or the other debate.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Listlad, post: 2203526, member: 499223"] [USER=468524]@pdmjoker[/USER] Cattle gases do not contribute to global warming. This is a fallacy. There is a good diagram which illustrates why. Any gases emitted are recycled. There is no net addition to gas levels generated. If no livestock is added then the figures do not change. On the other hand gases (and oil) trapped within the earth, once released by man, are additional and not part of a short term cycle. This is why meat should not be the target. And this is why any debate on the restriction of meat eating in environmental and global warming terms should include other contributing factors. There is a lot more to this that is relevant but am trying not to be seen to be crossing the thread boundary. So in summary, we should not be restricting either form of farming at all. Equally there shouldn’t be a one or the other debate. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post Reply
Home
Forums
Food and Nutrition
Low-carb Diet Forum
Reducing our carbon footprint BY dairy farming...
Top
Bottom
Find support, ask questions and share your experiences. Ad free.
Join the community »
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn More.…