Hi
@sno0opy
This is a question that comes up often, because we all wonder these things, especially at the beginning.
As you know, the HbA1c is a gauge of what our blood glucose has been doing for the last 2-3 months. Of course it is more complicated than that, but it is easiest just to think of it as a rough average.
While your fingerprick tests are snapshots of what your blood glucose is doing at the moment you take the test.
Have a look at this graphic:
your HbA1cs were 82 and 89, yes?
Those are the blue numbers mmol/mol across the top of the arc. They equate to an average blood glucose snapshot prick test of around 13.5mmol/l (see the bottom of the arc)
Your current prick test readings are around 4.8 to 5.8 with the odd trip up to 8.2.
If you assume that means an average of tests being around 6mmol/l (allowing for daily exercise), then that roughly equates to an HbA1c in the mid 30s.
Which is a fab improvement! Magnificent!!!
However, I don't want to mislead you. Since I'm talking in vague terms such as 'assume' and 'average' and 'roughly equates to' then you will appreciate that I'm not talking precision measurements.
It is common for people to find that their HbA1c does not quite match their expectations, and since you are only taking prick tests at points through the day, you have no way of knowing what happens at night, or whether you are timing your tests to hit the peaks of your blood glucose.
So, the best thing I can say is WELL DONE, you have made big changes, and they are paying off.
and
Keep it up - because you need to maintain these changes in the long term (permanently) to avoid slipping back into those higher blood glucose readings,
but
you really have transformed things.