As I said, some people do report reversing their 'background retinopathy' status with continued good control. Plus, it gives you the best chance of the retinopathy not progressing. I don't think there is currently clear-cut evidence of the effect of statins on retinopathy so probably not a reason for reviewing your decision.Thanks for the reply DarkHorse. Sorry for the delay in replying, it took a while to get my head round the great articles you posted. Assuming the metabolic memory theory is correct then the damage to my eyes has already been done and they won’t necessarily respond to good BG control anyway will they?(That is a question not a rhetorical question)
Before I was diagnosed with T2 my Total Cholesterol was 4.1 after I’d been on the LCHF and 16:8 fasting diet my HbA1c went down to 5.1 (from 7.8) which was great news but my TC went up to 6.42!! (Although I was told my numbers were good - TC/HDL ratio was 3.4) It feels like retinopathy or maculopathy is going to occur either as a result of too high BG or too high TC. Which then begs the question do I start taking statins now? I don’t take any medication at the moment. I know a lot of people are very anti - statin and I’m as confused as hell as up to this point I’ve refused to take them because my Q3 risk is 10.8% which is just past the cutoff point where GP’s are required to suggest statins and because they are known to raise BG levels!!! Because of this it didn’t seem worth it to take them but now my eyes are showing signs of retinopathy (either BG or TC related) I’m not sure whether I should start taking them. Seems like a viscous circle. Any more thoughts? Thank you for your interest in this. Jon.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?