Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to Thread
Guest, we'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the
Diabetes Forum Survey 2025 »
Home
Forums
Diabetes Discussion
Diabetes Discussions
Reversing Type 2 diabetes
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jenny15" data-source="post: 1801150" data-attributes="member: 196992"><p>I totally agree. Within the first few sentences of reading this report I thought to myself "are these guys undergrads?" Then I saw it was written in Iran, which is ruled by a totalitarian regime, further weakening any credibility the content of the report might have been able to earn. Corruption is rife in such countries. The methodology section was ridiculous too. </p><p></p><p>Another thing I assess is the journal itself. I haven't checked this one, but some of these "journals" are not real academic journals. There is usually no or weak peer review. Some of them are just private moneymaking enterprises with no scholarly credentials whatsoever. </p><p></p><p>Of all the academic disciplines, IMO, sociology is the worst for this sort of thing. At least in the physical sciences there is an ability to determine whether the research was even logical and possible. LOL</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jenny15, post: 1801150, member: 196992"] I totally agree. Within the first few sentences of reading this report I thought to myself "are these guys undergrads?" Then I saw it was written in Iran, which is ruled by a totalitarian regime, further weakening any credibility the content of the report might have been able to earn. Corruption is rife in such countries. The methodology section was ridiculous too. Another thing I assess is the journal itself. I haven't checked this one, but some of these "journals" are not real academic journals. There is usually no or weak peer review. Some of them are just private moneymaking enterprises with no scholarly credentials whatsoever. Of all the academic disciplines, IMO, sociology is the worst for this sort of thing. At least in the physical sciences there is an ability to determine whether the research was even logical and possible. LOL [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post Reply
Home
Forums
Diabetes Discussion
Diabetes Discussions
Reversing Type 2 diabetes
Top
Bottom
Find support, ask questions and share your experiences. Ad free.
Join the community »
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn More.…