Review highlights insulin resistance, not cholesterol, in predicting type 2 diabetes

DCUK NewsBot said:

A new review has challenged the importance of cholesterol in predicting type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease, arguing that insulin resistance is the most important predictor. The review, which appears in The Pharmaceutical Journal, also questions the value of the cholesterol-lowering drug statins, suggesting the benefits have been "grossly exaggerated". The researchers - Drs Maryanne Demasi, Robert H Lustig and Aseem Malhotra - highlight a number of studies where the directive to lower cholesterol using statins has failed to improve health outcomes. "'Big Pharma' has certainly triumphed, yet the patients have not," they wrote. "Given that statins can give the illusion of CVD protection, predispose the development of type 2 diabetes in up to 1 in 50 patients taking these drugs, and cause reversible side effects in up to 29% of users, stopping statins may paradoxically 'save more lives' and improve quality of life in those taking them." The researchers also target the need for current thinking about obesity and the role of calories to change. Instead of the amount of calories being significant, the focus should actually be on the sources of calories consumed. "Calorie-focused thinking is inherently biased against high-fat foods, many of which appear to be protective against obesity and the diseases of metabolic syndrome, and supportive of refined starch and sugar replacements, which are clearly detrimental, and exclusive of their calories and effects on weight gain." They say shifting this message could be achieved through reinforcing overeating and inactivity as the underlying causes of type 2 diabetes and CVD, rather than focus simply on calorie counting. They also propose insulin resistance is the most important predictor of CVD and type 2 diabetes. "The risk factor that has been most consistently associated with CVD, type 2 diabetes and obesity is 'insulin resistance' [which] plays a primary and causative role in the pathogenesis of hypertension, dyslipidaemia, fatty liver disease, and type 2 diabetes, collectively termed 'metabolic syndrome'." To lower insulin resistance the researchers advocate eating a high-fat, low-GL (glycemic load) diet and to get regular exercise. Then, instead of providing drug companies with greater financing, healthcare funds can be spent implementing better policies for lowering type 2 diabetes rates. "Then, and only then, might we achieve the goal of attenuating the prevalence of CVD and the other chronic diseases of the metabolic syndrome," the authors concluded.

Continue reading...

Click to expand...

librarising said:

"Drs Maryanne Demasi, Robert H Lustig and Aseem Malhotra."
Names I hold in high esteem. Leading the fight against outdated yet still established medical opinion.
Geoff

Click to expand...

Oldvatr said:

We await further research that will provide the irrefutable evidence that shows it is sustainable long term and safe for most.

Click to expand...

donnellysdogs said:

Malhotra Aseem is amazing.

Insulin resistance etc is also being linked to cancer..see Professor Robert Thomas. He got a youtube video going back to 2014....

Just been to a talk by him and insulin and diabetes was consistently mentioned as drivers to cancer.

Click to expand...

sally and james said:

I'm still waiting for the evidence that low-fat, high-carb is sustainable long term and safe for most!
Sally

Click to expand...

Oldvatr said:

My son recently had cancer. A so called Guru who is running a successful MLM operation declares that the problem is due to an acid diet, and that he must change immediately to an alkali diet. The mainstay of the diet plan is for my son to eat crushed apricot kernals, , which research will tell us contain cyanide, and are toxic. Luckily I was able to intervene in time. My wife unfortunately thinks this Guru has the sun shining from his derriere, and has a kind face, and so she is still pushing almond kernel diet to anyone she meets with cancer,

So yes, I do not find gutu's with a youtube presence to be any better than my neighbour as far as advice is concerned. At least the doctors authoring this article have a reliable track record, but IMO the jury is still debating their message about IR being behind T2 (and now cancer?)

Click to expand...