Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to Thread
Guest, we'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the
Diabetes Forum Survey 2024 »
Home
Forums
Food and Nutrition
Low-carb Diet Forum
Saturated fats;no longer deadly- BMJ
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AndBreathe" data-source="post: 938704" data-attributes="member: 88961"><p>I don't see [USER=74036]@Southport GP[/USER] as being a champion of HF. I see him acknowledging fat, and making a stated fact that he is "....a lot more tolerant of fat than 3 years ago and I suspect it has advantages as a source of energy...."</p><p></p><p>If I may state my own position on the fat consumption debate. I eat a reduced carb diet, and where and when necessary, I use fat to make up any calorific deficit I find myself in. I really the title LCHF, because the HF part of the title significantly increases rejection rate for the way of eating by those who want to explore alternative (to the NHS Eat Well late) ways to significantly improve their diabetes. I find my personally coined title of LCBF (Lower Carb, Balancing Fats) as being more descriptive of what I do, and has certainly been more readily acceptable to others I have discussed it with. I rarely even get the usual questions around lipids, because I make it plain it's only necessary to raise fats if weight loss continues beyond a desirable weight, and if hunger persists, having trimmed carbs back.</p><p></p><p>I think I want a campaign to change the name of the way of eating. Well, it'd make a change from folks wanting to dissociate T2 and T1?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AndBreathe, post: 938704, member: 88961"] I don't see [USER=74036]@Southport GP[/USER] as being a champion of HF. I see him acknowledging fat, and making a stated fact that he is "....a lot more tolerant of fat than 3 years ago and I suspect it has advantages as a source of energy...." If I may state my own position on the fat consumption debate. I eat a reduced carb diet, and where and when necessary, I use fat to make up any calorific deficit I find myself in. I really the title LCHF, because the HF part of the title significantly increases rejection rate for the way of eating by those who want to explore alternative (to the NHS Eat Well late) ways to significantly improve their diabetes. I find my personally coined title of LCBF (Lower Carb, Balancing Fats) as being more descriptive of what I do, and has certainly been more readily acceptable to others I have discussed it with. I rarely even get the usual questions around lipids, because I make it plain it's only necessary to raise fats if weight loss continues beyond a desirable weight, and if hunger persists, having trimmed carbs back. I think I want a campaign to change the name of the way of eating. Well, it'd make a change from folks wanting to dissociate T2 and T1? [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post Reply
Home
Forums
Food and Nutrition
Low-carb Diet Forum
Saturated fats;no longer deadly- BMJ
Top
Bottom
Find support, ask questions and share your experiences. Ad free.
Join the community »
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn More.…